Limit at infinity; l'hopital's rule not working as expected

cwbullivant
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Lim(t->(inf)) 1/2((t^2)+1) + (ln|(t^2)+1|)/2 - 1/2

Homework Equations



N/A (unless L'Hopital's rule can be counted as an equation for this section)

The Attempt at a Solution



Background:

The problem started with:

inf
∫(x^3)/((x^2)+1)^2 dx
0

Using partial fraction decomposition, and using two separate online calculators to verify the answer, this came to:1/2((x^2)+1) + (ln|(x^2)+1|)/2

Per requirements for bounds at infinity, I substituted infinity for t, coming out to:1/2((t^2)+1) + (ln|(t^2)+1|)/2 - 1/2

This appears to be something to use L'hopital's rule on. It is in 0 + Infinity state at the beginning. Given the infinity involved, the 1/2 is ignored as it is numerical insignificant as t becomes maximally large.

Making the appropriate simplification:

(1 + ((t^2) + 1)(ln|(t^2)+1|))/((2t^2)+2)

To save a bit of typing, L'hopital's rule, for the first two times, but after t dropped out of the denominator, it was reintroduced in the third derivative set, and seems to go on forever (implying the limit does not exist). When I plug in the original integral with a very large upper bound, it appears to be going to zero. However, I'm not satisfied with that; I need to know what I'm doing wrong in this limit that is causing it to give me an incorrect answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think you can use L'Hopital here? Unless there's a typo in your formula, L'Hopital seems completely inapplicable.

Perhaps what you need instead is just the sum of two limits: if lim f(x) = a, lim g(x) = b and a+b is well defined (not ∞-∞), then lim (f(x)+g(x)) = a+b.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top