Limit of x(e^(1/x)-1) as x approaches infinity: Solving with L'Hopital's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter James Brady
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    limit
James Brady
Messages
106
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Find ##\lim_{x\to\infty} x(e^{1/x}-1)##

Homework Equations


##\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to rewrite the function in terms of a ratio and then use L'Hopital's rule:

##\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{x}{(e^{1/x}-1)^{-1}} = \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{1}{-(e^{1/x}-1)^{-2}(\frac{1}{x}e^{1/x})}##

The problem is that the exponential terms never go away. The bigger problem is I believe L'Hopital's Rule is probably unnecessary and I'm missing something more basic here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it be easier for you to investigate :smile: $$\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0} {e^\varepsilon -1 \over \varepsilon } \ \ \rm ? $$
 
  • Like
Likes James Brady and PeroK
Another idea is to use power series.
 
BvU said:
Would it be easier for you to investigate :smile: $$\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0} {e^\varepsilon -1 \over \varepsilon } \ \ \rm ? $$

I am able to see what you did today :oldsmile:. ##\epsilon = 1/x , x = 1/ \epsilon## Now I can infer that as x goes to infinity, epsilon goes to zero, so by making this replacement, we also replace the limit from infinity to zero. Then once we get into this nice form, L'Hopital's Rule and we're good. I'm not sure if I've ever seen this technique before, at least I don't remember it.
 
James Brady said:
I attempted to rewrite the function in terms of a ratio and then use L'Hopital's rule:

##\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{x}{(e^{1/x}-1)^{-1}} = \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{1}{-(e^{1/x}-1)^{-2}(\frac{1}{x}e^{1/x})}##

The problem is that the exponential terms never go away. The bigger problem is I believe L'Hopital's Rule is probably unnecessary and I'm missing something more basic here.
You could write the ratio differently.
$$\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{e^{1/x}-1}{1/x}$$
That form succumbs straightforwardly to the hospital rule.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top