There is also 'polarity reversal' to consider- Both Frank G and I have seen this happen spontaneously and suddenly.
Hello Alan,
I thought this beahvior was linked to the cell temperature. Isn't it?
There is also 'polarity reversal' to consider- Both Frank G and I have seen this happen spontaneously and suddenly.
Hello Alan,
I thought this beahvior was linked to the cell temperature. Isn't it?
For me the case is closed. The SO(4) proton 3D/4D orbit bond exactly reproduces Mills measurements. Mills measurements are the only reliable ones as he produces pure H*-H*. In Holmlid's case there are always surface clusters of H*n where n = 7,19,31,..Spin orbit's couple long range so what he sees is a combination of orbits at work. This also explains that his values of radius 2.3pm and energy 630eV are way off.
Also the Dihydrino model for radius etc. is way off but only few %. Only the coupling works as this is based on energy.
What is needed are better experiments to understand how we must map SO(4) --> 3D,t. Also in Holmlid's case he e.g. should verify that he works on an e.g. well defined n=7 cluster, then we could refine the cluster coupling.
So if I understand right, the 2.3pm is a false interpretation by Holmlid of his results. By 'surface cluster', do you mean coplanar in 3D,t ?
Too much shortcuts in you answer to grasp what you try to explain.
There are no deep electron orbits. This is a silly extrapolation of long time refuted (Dirac) models that are not withstanding basic mathematical logic. All mass is EM mass and a bound electron is EM-flux. Rotating flux can have any speed >>c in reference to the classic 3D,t space as experiments do show.
Then was it your interpretations of Leif Holmlid results with your SO(4) theory?
I was referring to the the fact that you said H*-H* is dead for fusion. There is the direct path 4 H* to He4 that could explain excess heat with H*.
On the contrary, D* LENR reaction may produce free neutron
Wyttenbach you are saying that He4 is made of 4 protons. Why not then the direct reaction 4 H* to He4?
Wyttenbach : calcination has nothing to do with CaCO3. Those 2 are complete different things
The reactor seems to have been designed to incorporate helmotz coil and also a fluid cooling system. Am I right?
Zitterbewegung in french is Zitterbewegung ... just the pronunciation is different
If it is tritium, we should see more m=5 (T-D) than m=6 (T-T)
Display MoreTo beed up at little bit your corona time I want try to deepen the general knowledge of the average user of LENR forum.
Classic Maxwell, particle physics is based one halve each on the electron and proton -- ignoring some other puzzle stones.
The biggest unsolved question of SM (Standard model) is the oversimplification of the charge concept that many time is mixed up with an electron.
The worst idea ever was the assumption that the electron is a point particle and hence the charge is an infinitesimal small unity - what is great for mathematics only. As a conclusion of this, charge must be indivisible, what is not the case as some fake particles show e.g 1/3 charge. And worse in the quantum hall effect we see almost all possible fractions of charge.
But how do mass and charge coexist? Especially if the electron has no volume then it must be of infinite large density.
More worse. QM assume that charge e.g - around a proton is smeared over a complex orbit modeled by multipole expansion of waves. Now the electron suddenly has a very large volume!
In the simplest case charge is smeared over the surface of a sphere. But unluckily it's not smeared in a uniform way as the charge = electron shows a magnetic moment. This violates the rule of a uniform distribution what needs adding a spin what violates the logic of a symmetric behavior of charge and finally leads to the question:
If charge is not a point and smeared over a surface why is itself not repulsive??
Here any logic stops as current physics (Standard model) has no explanation (detail model for charge) and not the faintest idea to explain why charge violates the axioms. This is known since 100 years but so far nobody could solved the problem and like you ignore the bad behavior of a good friend physicists stop to think about it.
SO(4) physics shows that charge is a topological effect of nested magnetic flux. All problems with unsolved infinities of point charges, mass density etc. do vanish under the proper assumptions.
Thank you Jürg, One of the best introduction to your SO(4) physics you have made so far!
yes, i think the best way to be well uniform should be chemical plating, here by a beam we should have small thickness variations mostly we stay at nanometers level.
Only a SEM will show something. Here we see nothing with a classical microscope.
Now, with today understandings, only the experiment will prove which method is best.
Well, let's meet closer to the exit, I'll wait, I don't know English ....
Do you want we meet tomorrow at Fiumicino? I will arrive from Brussels flight at 17h. Then I will take the train from Fiumicino to Assisi with one change at Rome Tiburtina station (arrival time at 21h49, I hope the hotel will still be open
I will be there tomorrow around the same time
If anybody wants to get in touch I will be meeting Ruby Carat around 5.25 pm at Fiumicino and travelling on Sunday be early train to Assisi . My phone number is +44 7944 847870
Hello Alan Smith I will arrive at Fiumicino Sunday at 5pm CEST. What is you plan to move from Fiumicino to Assisi ?
Display MoreHere it is again with absolute errors in eV and explicit +/- signs. Hopefully this time it should be ok.
The issue I was referring about was that it was skipping empty energy lists for any given energy level.
Basically it was compressing away the "holes" you can see in the first thumbnail below and so it was giving shifted results for some every levels.
(readable version in the attached pdf)
Great work can !
Tellurium is the perfect match from n=inf to n=1/8 !!! Shame tellurium is as rare as platinum. This could be the cause of its rarity : H(n=1/8) could sporadically fuse with its catalyser.
Thank you can. You took the absolute value. The sign is an information. There is an excess or a short in difference energy.
Out of curiosity, I made a small script for generating automatically a list of electron catalysts according to Simon Brink's theories. This allowed not only to effortlessly list them all for all energy levels, but also plotting only a limited subset.
For example, in addition to the full table, I also tried making one which only includes very common elements, and another only including noble gases.
can It would be interesting to have this table in absolute error instead of relative. At 10keV, 0.1% is a lot of eV (10) in comparison of matches at 100 eV range.
axil: If you try to add energy to a proton (inside deuterium it works best) , then the magnetic moment tries to balance it by releasing a certain quantum of energy, what lets the proton fall into a "deep" magnetic state. A chain of protons in such a deep state can mediate (accumulate) the energy hole what finally leads to D-D fusion.
The interesting point is how e.g. iron oxide is promoting such deep magnetic states.
Could you give us the source of infomation regarding Iron oxide (Fe2O3 or Fe3O4 ?) promoting the deep magnetic states ?