.Line Integral in the First Quadrant

  • Thread starter Thread starter kidia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the line integral ∫C (2xy^3)dx + (4x^2y^2)dy over a closed path in the first quadrant. Participants suggest using Green's Theorem for simplification, although there is debate about whether the theorem can be applied given the function's properties. It is clarified that all polynomials are analytic and that only continuous differentiability is required for Green's Theorem. The conversation also includes step-by-step integration along the specified path segments, emphasizing the importance of parametrization. Ultimately, the discussion highlights different approaches to solving the integral while addressing theoretical considerations.
kidia
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Question:
Starting from anyone of the three corners of the path described here under,evaluate the line integral \intc (2xy^3)dx + (4x^2y^2)dy where C is the closed path forming the boundary of region in the first quadrant enclosed by x-axis,the line x=1 and the curve y=x^3
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, what have you got so far?
 
kidia said:
Question:
Starting from anyone of the three corners of the path described here under,evaluate the line integral \intc (2xy^3)dx + (4x^2y^2)dy where C is the closed path forming the boundary of region in the first quadrant enclosed by x-axis,the line x=1 and the curve y=x^3

Any time you have a nice closed path with the line integral in that form, try and remember to use Green's Theorem:

\oint_C Mdx+Ndy=\iint_R(\frac{\partial N}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial M}{\partial y})dA

Just plug it in right?
 
Not so fast saltydog - I don't think he is allowed to use Green or Stokes for now.

just parametrize the curves, find derivative of that curve and then you can find individual line integrals of int(F dot dr) for all segments
 
It's easier to compute the double integral than the line integral...So i vote for Green as well.

Daniel.
 
I might be embarrassing myself here but isn't there some sort of requirement that the function be analytic before you use Green's Theorem? And not all polynomials are analytic.
 
i don't think green has much hypotheses? maybe smoothness? try proving it and see what you need.

it follows from fubini (repeated integration) plus ftc.

of course all polynomials are analytic, but i am asuming you meant that you thought the form had to be closed, which is not necessary.
 
Last edited:
That domain should be described by x running from 0 to 1 and y from 0 to x^{3}...

Daniel.
 
snoble said:
I might be embarrassing myself here but isn't there some sort of requirement that the function be analytic before you use Green's Theorem? And not all polynomials are analytic.

All the polynomials I know are analytic!

(And you don't need the function to be analytic for Green's theorem- "continuously differentiable" is enough.)

The only question is whether kidia has had "Green's theorem" in Calculus class yet.

It's not that hard to actually integrate along the path:
1) from (0,0) to (1, 0) along the x- axis: take x= t, y= 0 so that dx= dt, dy= 0. Since y= 0 along that path, the integral on it is 0.

2) from (1,0) to (1,1) along the line x= 1:take x= 1, y= t so that dx= 0, dy= dt. integrate
4t2dt from 0 to 1.

3) from (1,1) to (0,0) along the line y= x: take x= t, y= t so that dx= dt, dy= dt. integrate from t= 1 down to t= 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
I knew I was setting myself up for embarresment.
 
Back
Top