1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Line Integrals in Cal 4

  1. Jul 23, 2008 #1
    *Please don't just read the first post and leave. I'm adding to the thread with each attempt. I'm not asking someone to do it for me!*

    I guess this is a lousy first post, and I apologize, but I am desperate and would appreciate all the help I can get more than anyone could imagine! This is the first problem of the section. I've been sick and haven't made it to any lectures covering this particular material and my final is TOMORROW! Please please help me if you can!

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Evaluate Sc (x + y) ds where C is the straight line segment x=t, y=(1-t), z=0, from (0,1,1) to (1,0,0).

    2. Relevant equations
    3. The attempt at a solution
    Kind of both of those together. My text say to integrate a continuous function f(x,y,z) over a curve C:

    1. Find a smooth parametrization of C
    r(t) = g(t)i + h(t)j + k(t)k, t in the interval [a,b]

    2. Evaluate the integral as
    Sc f(x,y,z) ds = bSa f (g(t),h(t),k(t))|v(t)| dt

    Can someone at least help me get started and try to figure it out myself?

    The italicized S's are supposed to be integral signs!
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 23, 2008 #2
    Okay, I know from the back of the book the answer is root2. This is what I did, and it got me the right answer, but if someone could check to make sure I did it right, that'd be awesome. Thank you!!!

    I set the interval from [0,1] because the lowest x and lowest y are 0 and the highest of each is 1. So I have 0S1 (x + y) ds

    C says x is equal to t and y = 1-t so I plugged those in and got t + (1 - t) which is just 1.

    For r(t), I said it was ti + tj because there are no powers to the t's and that's as simple as it gets. Then, |v(t)| = |i + j| which is root2

    I wound up with 0S1 f(t,t) root2 dt

    0S1 (t + t) (root2) dt

    Pull root2 out (constant) and get root2 0S1 2t dt

    Then integrate and get root2 [ t2 ] evaluated from 1 to 0

    root2 [12 - 02] is root2 * 1 = root2

    and that's what I was supposed to get. Did I do it right though?
  4. Jul 23, 2008 #3
    The next problem is evaluate CS (xy + y + z) ds along the curve r(t)=2ti+tj+(2-2t)k, t in [0,1].

    I got |v(t)| = |2i + j - 2k| = 3

    0S1 2t + t + 2 - 2t 3 dt

    0S1 t + 2 3 dt

    3 0S1 t + 2 dt

    3[ (t2)/2 + 2t] eval. from 1 to 0

    3[ 1/2 + 2] = 3[ 5/2] = 15/2

    I did something wrong though, I think, because the book says the solution is 13/2
  5. Jul 23, 2008 #4
    I tried that last problem again and substituted x,y,z with 2t, t, and (2-2t), respectively. My integral was then

    0S1 2t2 - t + 2 3 dt

    3 0S1 2t2 - t + 2 dt

    3[ (2t3)/3 -t2/2 +2t ] from 0 to 1

    3[ 2/3 - 1/2 + 2 -0] = 13/2

    I got it right, but again, did I do it right?
  6. Jul 23, 2008 #5
    Next problem.

    Find the line integral of f(x,y,z) = x + y + z over the straight line segment from (1,2,3) to (0,-1,1). Solution is 3*root14

    I got a root14 by finding the distance between the two points and I set my t interval from 0 to root14, but I'm thinking that was wrong.

    I had 0Sroot14 t + t + t root3 dt

    I set r(t) = ti + tj+ tk and |v(t)| = root3

    I worked it out and got (21 times root3)/2

    ... what gives?
  7. Jul 23, 2008 #6


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Your integrand expression is incorrect.

    Now it is right.
  8. Jul 23, 2008 #7


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    That root14 corresponds to [tex]\left| \frac{d\textbf{r}}{dt} \right|[/tex] in the formula for a scalar line integral.

    That's not correct. What is the formula for evaluating a scalar line integral?

    The expression for r(t) as you have given would correspond to a point passing through the origin. Does the line through (1,2,3) to (0,-1,1) pass through the origin?
  9. Jul 23, 2008 #8
    Honestly, I have no clue. I wish you were still online, though. I've pretty much given up and I was planning on not studying anymore for this exam since I need a 95 on it to get a C. Your reply has given me hope!

    I can't see what you posted after "that root14 corresponds to".... I get a red x.

    The line does not go through the origin. I still don't understand how to get the interval. I'm teaching myself over here, and quickly losing faith in my abilities.

    The formula for evaluating a scalar line integral... again, no clue.

    I know I need A LOT of help over here, but I'm willing to pull an all nighter if someone (or several someones) will help me. My exam is scheduled for 8.5 hours from now.
  10. Jul 24, 2008 #9
    Okay. I have a theory on that last one. At least, I get the right answer. Again, is my technique correct?

    f(x,y,z)= x+y+z

    r(t) = ti + 3tj + 2tk (the distance between corresponding coordinates in the points given.)

    v(t) = i + 3j + 2k |v(t)| = root14 (YAY)

    I'm assuming t between 0 and 1 because it works. Not sure why those numbers, but they work so I used them.

    0S1 t + 3t + 2t root14 dt

    root14 0S1 6t dt

    root14 [3t2] from 0 to 1, which comes out to 3root14

    What I need to know though, is why 0 to 1? The test problems are taking directly from the book, so I essentially just need to memorize the problems, but working through something is so much easier when you understand it! This is the third problem in the first section of new material. There are 28 more problems that I need to get through tonight. And they keep getting harder!
  11. Jul 24, 2008 #10


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    What do your notes and textbook say about evaluating scalar line integrals? Keep in mind that you're looking for the part on line integrals of scalar functions. Look it up in the book index and read that relevant section if necessary. I've done last minute studying before and I would say it's always better to do last minute preparation than none at all, although it's undoubtedly better to be prepared beforehand.
  12. Jul 24, 2008 #11


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    You did get the right answer, but I don't think your expression for r(t) is correct. Bear in mind that r(t) is the vector equation of the line through those 2 points specified by the question. What is the vector equation of the line through any 2 given points?
  13. Jul 24, 2008 #12
    All is says that makes any sense whatsoever is the snippet I put in the first post.

    1. Find a smooth parametrization of C
    r(t) = g(t)i + h(t)j + k(t)k, t in the interval [a,b]

    2. Evaluate the integral as
    Sc f(x,y,z) ds = bSa f (g(t),h(t),k(t))|v(t)| dt
  14. Jul 24, 2008 #13
    Is it as simple as (x1-x0)ti + (y1-y0)ti + (z1-z0)ti? So, (0-1) for x, (-1-2) for y, and (1-3) for z? Or am I backwards? I've been awake for nearly 24 hours already. My brain isn't functioning fully
  15. Jul 24, 2008 #14
    Logically, I want to say r(t) = ti + 2tj + 3tk because one of the points is (1,2,3), but there's no way it's that simple... It has to have 1,2, and 3 for coefficients, because that gives root14.
  16. Jul 24, 2008 #15
    The next one is even worse. I'm going to post it before I work on it to give you some time to look at it also. You are helping me so much! I wish there was some way I could repay you!

    Integrate f(x,y,z) = (x + y + z)/(x2 + y2 + z2) over the path r(t) = ti + tj + tk, 0< a<= t <= b.
  17. Jul 24, 2008 #16
    Okay, that last one wasn't so bad once I got into it.

    r(t) is given. From that |v(t)| = root3

    Interval is given: [a,b]

    Sub t into each x, y, and z. Reduce the equation and you get:

    root3 aSb (t-1) dt

    root3 [ln b - ln a] = root3 ln(b/a) which is the answer.

    Is my technique right?
  18. Jul 24, 2008 #17
    Next problem. Three more and then next section.

    Integrate f over the given curve:

    f (x,y) = x3/y
    C: y = x2/2
    0<= x <= 2

    I don't even know where to start! There's no example like this in the text. I have nothing to follow.
  19. Jul 24, 2008 #18


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    No, as said earlier, the parametrisation you need is the vector equation of a line. What does a path paramatrisation represent? It maps values of a parameter, say t to a vector which extends from the origin to that point of the path it corresponds to. So far example, the line y=2x+c may be paramatrised as [tex]\textbf{r}(t) = t\textbf{i} + (2t+c) \textbf{j} [/tex]. There are special parametric representations as well without using either x or y as the varying parameter. To take an example, the parametrisation of a circle x^2 + y^2 = r^2 would could be [tex]\textbf{r}(t) = r \cos t \textbf{i} + r \sin t \textbf{j} \ \mbox{where} \ t \in [0,2\pi][/tex]

    Yes it looks correct. In this case it appears you know how to evaluate a line integral. Your problem it appears thus far is understanding how to do a parametrisation of a path. Just look that up in any textbook.

    Well, as before start by first coming up with a parametrisation of the curve y=x^2/2. It should be a vector function of the form r(t). The statement of the question also gives you a hint as to what you should use as a parameter.
  20. Jul 24, 2008 #19
    Okay. I think I have r(t), but it isn't pretty.

    r(t)= (1-t)i + (2-3t)j + (3-2t)k
    v(t)= -1i -3j -2k
    |v| = root(1+9+4) = root14 (AHA!)

    Is that right? And t goes from 0 to 1 because if you plug in 0 you get one endpoint of the segment and if you plug in 1 you get the other endpoint.
  21. Jul 24, 2008 #20


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Yes that's right.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Line Integrals in Cal 4
  1. Cal II Integration (Replies: 5)

  2. Integral 4 (Replies: 7)

  3. Integrals 4 (Replies: 5)