Line of sight and star density question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Illuminati
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Line Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mean free path in an infinitely large universe with a star density of n = 10^9 Mpc^-3 and a stellar radius equivalent to the Sun's. To find the average distance one could see before encountering a star, one must convert the cross-sectional area of the Sun into Mpc^2 and apply it to the density. The calculation involves dimensional analysis, combining units of density and area to derive a distance. The conversation highlights the vastness of the universe required for such a scenario, suggesting it would need to be nearly 10^19 times older than the current universe. Understanding these concepts is crucial for approaching the problem effectively.
Illuminati
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is blatant homework help that I don't know how to approach. Any hints would be appreciated.

Suppose you are in an infinitely large old universe in which the average density of stars is n = 109 Mpc-3 and the average stellar radius is equal to the sun's radius is R = 7*108. How far, on average, could you see in any direction before your line of sight strikes a star?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Look up "mean free path".
 
Also, be careful of the units here-- if the density is in terms of Mpc-3, then you want the cross sectional area of the Sun in units of Mpc2 to avoid having to convert units during your calculation. wolframalpha.com tells me that the answer for the Sun is 2 times 10-38 Mpc2. How can you combine that with the density to get a distance, which will be the mean free path you want? (It would require a pretty darn big universe to hit a star-- for one thing, the universe would need to be almost 1019 times older than it actually is, right?)
 
You can use dimensional analysis to get something out of this, and then see if it makes sense to you. 1/L^3 and L^2 can be combined how to get L?

This won't get you any constants or other unit-less things though, but maybe it will help you see the problem more clearly.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top