Linear algebra direct sum proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the direct sum of two subspaces, W1 and W2, within a vector space V. The original poster seeks to establish the equivalence between W1 ⊕ W2 = V and the unique representation of vectors in V as sums of vectors from W1 and W2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of assuming the existence of vectors from W1 and W2 that sum to a vector in V, questioning the uniqueness of this representation. They discuss the conditions under which the intersection of the subspaces is trivial and how this relates to the uniqueness of the decomposition.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the proof structure, with some participants clarifying the conditions necessary for uniqueness and others considering the implications of the intersection of the subspaces. Guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the uniqueness of the decomposition and the properties of the subspaces.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to prove both directions of the equivalence, emphasizing the importance of establishing the uniqueness of the decomposition alongside the sum of the subspaces equating to V.

zcd
Messages
197
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let W1 and W2 be subspaces of a vector space V. Prove that W_1\oplus{}W_2=V \iff each vector in V can be uniquely written as x1+x2=v, where x_1\in W_1 and x_2\in W_2

Homework Equations


W_1\oplus{}W_2=V means W_1\cap W_2 =\{0\}, W_1 + W_2 =V and W1 & W2 are subspaces of V

8 axioms defining vector space

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to assume that \exists x'_1,x'_2: x'_1+x'_2=v and x'_1\in W_1, x'_2\in W_2 and then proving x'_1=x_1, x'_2=x_2, but I'm unsure of where to go from that step.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If x1+x2=v and x1'+x2'=v then (x1-x1')+(x2-x2')=0. (x1-x1') is in W1. (x2-x2') is in W2. 0 is in W1. Is (x2-x2') in W1?
 
(x_2-x'_2)\in W_1\iff x_2-x'_2=0
 
zcd said:
(x_2-x'_2)\in W_1\iff x_2-x'_2=0

So you've got it?
 
I can see how this proves W_1\oplus{}W_2=V, but I'm still unsure on how x1 and x2 are unique. Is it because if x_i\neq x'_i then the two vectors are in different subspaces, while if x_i= x'_i the two subspaces will overlap at zero?
 
zcd said:
I can see how this proves W_1\oplus{}W_2=V, but I'm still unsure on how x1 and x2 are unique. Is it because if x_i\neq x'_i then the two vectors are in different subspaces, while if x_i= x'_i the two subspaces will overlap at zero?

It doesn't prove W1+W2=V. It proves if W1+W2=V then the decomposition is unique. You have to also prove if the decomposition is unique then W1+W2=V.
 
For the reverse argument, can I say that S:=W_1 \cap W_2 and \exists s\inS: x_1+x_2+s=v\implies s=0, therefore S=\{ 0\}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K