Linear Algebra - Eigenvalue Problem

chill_factor
Messages
898
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Let there be 3 vectors that span a space: { |a>, |b>, |c> } and let n be a complex number.

If the operator A has the properties:

A|a> = n|b>
A|b> = 3|a>
A|c> = (4i+7)|c>

What is A in terms of a square matrix?

Homework Equations



det(A-Iλ)=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't even know how to start. Can someone give me a starting hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine |a>=(1,0,0), |b>=(0,1,0), |c>=(0,0,1)
What would the square matrix be then?
Once you've got that, how can you relate your "hypothetical" square matrix to the correct one?
 
Since A maps a three dimensional vector space to itself, it can be represented as a 3 by 3 matrix and so can be written
\begin{bmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{bmatrix}

Since you have basis vectors |a>, |b>, and |c>, they can be written as <1, 0, 0>, <0, 1, 0>, and <0, 0, 1>, respectively. What do you get when you multiply each of those by the matrix above?

You are told that "A|a> = n|b>", that is the what you got by multiplying A by <1, 0, 0> must be equal to <0, n, 0> for this complex number n. Compare the two.

Similarly, you are told that "A|b> = 3|a>". In other words, what you got by mutiplying A by <0, 1, 0> must be equal to <3, 0, 0>.

Finally, you are told that "A|c> = (4i+7)|c>" so that what you got by multiplying A by <0, 0, 1> must be equal to <0, 0, 4i+7>.
 
Ok, I didn't think of that. Writing them out in terms of specific numbers is helpful. However, why can we do that?

I think I understand why they were written that way a little. Is it because they are orthogonal elements of a Hilbert Space and since they are orthogonal, we can define a coordinate system such that one is <1,0,0> and the other 2 are necessarily orthogonal to it and others, following the right hand rule?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top