Linear Algebra. Proving differentiable functions are a vector space.

datran
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Question: Show the set of all differentiable functions on (-infinity, +infinity) that satisfy f′ + 2f = 0 is a vector space.

I started the problem by assuming that f and g are both differentiable functions that satisfy this vector space.

Then I ran through the ten axioms of addition and scalar multiplication and proving that each one works.

I feel like that does not answer the question though since why would I need the equation f' + 2f = 0?

How does that equation come into play?

Thanks for any help provided.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi datran! welcome to pf! :smile:
datran said:
I feel like that does not answer the question though since why would I need the equation f' + 2f = 0?

How does that equation come into play?

you have to prove eg that (f+g) satisfies that equation :wink:

(yes, i know it's obvious … but you still have to prove it!)
 
Oh!

So I would do (f+g) = (f+g)' + 2(f+g) = 0

and same thing over and over for the 10 axioms.

So really f and g are like variables?

Thank you so much! That actually made many more problems clearer!
 
You can start by proving that the set of all differentiable functions from ℝ to ℝ with the standard definitions of addition and scalar multiplication is a vector space. (Looks like you've done that already). Denote this space by V. Define U={f in V|f'+2f=0}. U is by definition a subset of V. If you prove that U contains the 0 function and is closed under addition and scalar multiplication, you can conclude that U is a subspace of V.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top