Linear algebra, when does the implications hold?

bobby2k
Messages
126
Reaction score
2
Hi, I have 4 implications I am interested in, I think I know the answer to the first 2, but the last two is not something I know, however they are related to the first 2 so I will include all to be sure.

Assume that T is a linear transformation from from vectorspace A to B.

T: A -> B
A* is n vectors in A, that is A* = {a1, a2, an}

1.
T(A*) linearly independent -> A* linearly independent
If T(A*) is linearly independent, then A* must be linearly independent, without any requirements for T?

2.
T(A*) lindearly dependent -> A* linearly dependent
If T(A*) is linearly dependent, then we can only conclude that A* is linearly independent only if T is 1-1, if T is not 1-1 we can not conlude anything?

3.
span(T(A*))=B -> span(A*)= A
If span(T(A*)) = B, what requirement must we have to conlude that span(A*) = A. That T is 1-1, surejective, both or none?

4.
span(T(A*)) ≠ B -> span(A*) ≠ A*
If span(T(A*)) is not B what must we have to conlude that span(A*) is not A? Will this implication hold if T is 1-1, surjective, both or none?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. If c1a1+...+cnan=0, then T(c1a1+...+cnan)=0. So no restrictions.
2. Injectivity is not needed. Consider T: R^3->R^2. T(x,y,z)=(x,y). Surjectivity is not needed. Consider
T: R^2->R^3. T(x,y)=(x,y,0).
3. Let B={0} and you'll see surjectivity isn't enough. 1-1 is. Think of any x in A and consider T(x)=c1T(a1)+c2T(a2)+...+cnT(an).
4. Your last statement is equivalent to span(A*)=A -> span(T(A*)) = B. If dim(A)<dim(B) and you have n=dim(A) vectors, this is not true. So injectivity is not enough. Surjectivity is though. Consider y in B. Then there is an x in A such that T(x)=y. Or T(c1a1+...cnan)=y.
 
The word is 'linearly'.
 
johnqwertyful said:
2. Injectivity is not needed. Consider T: R^3->R^2. T(x,y,z)=(x,y). Surjectivity is not needed. Consider
T: R^2->R^3. T(x,y)=(x,y,0).
Hey, thanks man.
I just have some more questions, are you allowed to prove a general statement with examples?

Also, i am not sure about the example.
T(x,y,z) = (x,y)
if A* = {(1,1,0),(1,1,1)}
then T(A*) = {(1,1),(1,1)}
so T(A*) is linearly dependent, but A* is not, so the implication is false here.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top