Linear approximations derived from Taylor series

_Greg_
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I have the problem questiona dn my teachers solution posted below.
I understand:

f(xo) = sin pi/6
f '(xo) = cos pi/6

but i don't know how he gets them into fraction form with the SQRT of 3, it looks like some pythagoras but i don't really know how he did it.


Homework Equations



Question 3(a) (sorry I named it 'answer' instead of 'question')

answer.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



solution.jpg


:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi _Greg_! :smile:

(have a pi: π :wink:)
_Greg_ said:
f(xo) = sin pi/6
f '(xo) = cos pi/6

but i don't know how he gets them into fraction form with the SQRT of 3, it looks like some pythagoras but i don't really know how he did it.

I can't see the pictures yet, but π/6 = 30º, which is the little angle of half an equilateral triangle, so sin(π/6) (opp/hyp) = 1/2, and yes from Pythagoras you get cos(π/6) = √3/2. :smile:
 
Thanks for the fast reply tiny tim.
But how would you know its a 30* triangle, and how do you know cos pi/6 = sqrt3/2
Like sin pi/6, is pi close enough to 3 to just call it 3/6?
I don't really know much of the basics, I'm pretty much learning this for the deep end, looking for trends to understand
 
(what happened to that π i gave you? :confused:)
_Greg_ said:
But how would you know its a 30* triangle

Because π = 180º, so π/6 = 30º

(and an equilateral triangle has all angles equal, and they add up to 180º, so each angle is 60º, and half that is 30º)
Like sin pi/6, is pi close enough to 3 to just call it 3/6?

No, just draw half an equilateral triangle …

one side will be half the length of the other.
 
aaaaaaah, I see, I thought that little n symbol was pi.
And of course, it all adds up to 180*, high school maths is all coming back now :rolleyes:
Many thanks :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top