Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Linear coefficient of thermal expansion

  1. Dec 13, 2014 #1

    Nathanael

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    The "coefficient of linear expansion" ([itex]≡k[/itex]) was defined in my book by the following relationship:
    ##\Delta L=Lk\Delta T##
    Where L is length and T is temperature

    I'm wondering, is this just an approximation? Because, if you were to increase the temperature by [itex]\Delta T[/itex] and then calculate the new length, and then decrease the temperature by the same [itex]\Delta T[/itex] and calculate the new length again, you would not get back to your original length.

    Wouldn't the "symmetrical" definition of [itex]k[/itex] be
    ##L_{f}=L_{0}e^{k\Delta T}##

    This leads me to the question:
    Is the reason they don't define it like this because the idea of 'linear thermal expansion' is not true to that degree of accuracy?
    (In other words, finding the new length (to that accuracy) is not as simple as using a single constant?)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 13, 2014 #2

    Bystander

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    It's temperature dependent, and generally so small that the dependence isn't measureable before things melt/decompose.
     
  4. Dec 13, 2014 #3

    Stephen Tashi

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    That's only an approximation if we treat the [itex] \Delta[/itex]'s as finite, which is the traditional interpretation of [itex] \Delta[/itex]'s.

    I notice the Wikipedia article defines the coefficient of linear expansion using the notation for derivatives. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_expansion
     
  5. Dec 13, 2014 #4

    Nathanael

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Thanks, I didn't see that. Everywhere I looked kept using [itex] \Delta L[/itex] and [itex] \Delta T[/itex]. Next time I'll be sure to check Wikipedia.
     
  6. Dec 13, 2014 #5
    I think it was very perceptive of you to intuitively realize that it should, more precisely, be expressed differentially.

    Chet
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Linear coefficient of thermal expansion
  1. Thermal Expansion (Replies: 1)

Loading...