Linear function standard basis.

Matriculator
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know what L is? I'm trying to see if I could find videos on it on YouTube.

On the first question this is what I think- [a;b] is a vector by the way:

1) [2;1]c1+[7;4]c2=[1;0]
[2;1]c1+[7;4]c2=[0;1]

I could have also combined those two by having the linear combination equal to a size 2 identity matrix, right?! Is this correct?

2) This is where I'm lost. I know how to switch between a standard basis and a given basis. I'm not exactly sure of the nature of the equation being asked or what it even is, including what L is.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    13.6 KB · Views: 462
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me take a guess at L. From the first condition, it takes an x and transforms to a y. And from the second condition, it takes a y and transforms to a -x.

L = \begin{bmatrix}
0 & -1 \\
1 & 0 \\
\end{bmatrix}

you can check that this L satisfies your mapping constraints.
 
Matriculator said:
Does anyone know what L is? I'm trying to see if I could find videos on it on YouTube.

What do you mean? The problem statement tells you what L is. It's a linear function between R2 and R2.

On the first question this is what I think- [a;b] is a vector by the way:

1) [2;1]c1+[7;4]c2=[1;0]
[2;1]c1+[7;4]c2=[0;1]
Strictly speaking, what you wrote has no solution because there are no ##c_1## and ##c_2## that satisfy both equation at once. Assuming you're just being sloppy, I'd say you have the right idea.

I could have also combined those two by having the linear combination equal to a size 2 identity matrix, right?! Is this correct?
Not really. How can a linear combination of column vectors produce a 2x2 matrix?

2) This is where I'm lost. I know how to switch between a standard basis and a given basis. I'm not exactly sure of the nature of the equation being asked or what it even is, including what L is.

What do you mean when you say you "know how to switch between a standard basis and a given basis"?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top