Linear Independence/Dependence of set

  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the linear independence or dependence of a set of vectors derived from distinct vectors in a vector space. The original poster presents a scenario where a set S = {x, y, z} is known to be linearly independent, and they are tasked with determining the nature of the set S* = span({x+z, x-y}).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of linear independence and dependence, questioning whether S* represents the entire span or just the two vectors. They discuss the implications of linear combinations and the nature of the vectors involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, providing insights into the nature of linear combinations and the characteristics of spans. Some participants suggest that the original proof may not adequately address the linear dependence of the span, while others clarify the implications of having multiple vectors in a span.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the definitions and properties of linear combinations, spans, and the implications of having more vectors than the dimension of the space they occupy. The original poster's understanding of linear independence is being challenged by the nature of the vectors in S*.

JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Suppose that x,y, and z are distinct vectors in a vector space V over a field F, and S = {x,y,z} is linearly independent. If S* = span({x+z, x-y}), prove whether S* is linearly independent or linearly dependent.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



S* = a(x+z) + b(x-y) = ax + bx -by + az = (a+b)x - by + az, where a and b are coefficients. We know that this linear relationship only has the trivial solution (because we are told that the set S = {x,y,z} is linearly independent), thus S* must be linearly independent.This is the solution I have, but apparently it's wrong. The set is linearly dependent. Why is that?

EDIT: I know that I didn't write a linear combination of the span, I just wrote out the span. But the span itself is a linear combination of the vectors and a linear combination of a linear combination is still a linear combination, so just to simplify things I only wrote out the span of the vectors.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is S* the whole span of those vectors, or is S* just the two vectors? If it's the span, it's obviously linearly dependent, as e.g. x+z, 2(x+z) are both in S*, so a(x+z) + b[2(x+z)] = 0 has b=-1, a=2 as a solution
 
S* is the span. But the two vectors are (x+z) and (x-y). Not (x+z) and (x+z).
 
Wow, I just realized what you were really trying to say. :smile:

I see what you are saying now. But what is wrong with my proof?
 
Your proof is that the two vectors x+z and x-y are linearly independent, which they are. The set of all vectors of the form a*(x+z) + b*(x-y) isn't... to check this, you'd take a look at a summation

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^n(a_i(x+z) + b_i(x-y)) = 0[/tex] for any scalars ai and bi (n is an arbitrary finite natural number)
 
Thanks. I think I understand now (your first example made it easy)

Let me give my own example to see if I really have it down.

Let's say v = [tex]a_1(x+z) + b_1(x-y))[/tex] and

p = [tex]a_2(x+z) + b_2(x-y))[/tex]

Then if you choose [tex]a_2 = -a_1[/tex] and [tex]b_2 = -b_1[/tex], then obviously the set consisting of v and p is linearly dependent.
 
Sure, that's right. But you are still thinking too hard. I like (x+z) and 2(x+z) much better. Because it shows you how obvious it really is. The span contains an infinite numbers of vectors. A linearly independent set over a two dimensional subspace (like the span) contains only two. Even a subset containing three vectors MUST be linearly dependent. An infinite number is way overkill.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K