Linear Motion Integration Problem

VincentweZu
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the acceleration of a particle on a horizontal line is x where x represents the position in centimetres from the starting position of zero and if the initial velocity is 8 centimetres per second find the velocity of the particle when it is in a position of 15 centimetres


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted solving the equation using separation of variables.

let x = 15

a = 15
∫dv = ∫15dt
v = 15t + c c = 8
v = 15t + 8
∫dx = ∫15t + 8dt
x = 7.5t2 + 8t Assuming object starts at origin c = 0
15 = 7.5t2 + 8t Solving the quadratic
t = 0.9781

let t = 0.9781
v = 15(0.9781) + 8
v = 22.67cm/s

I know that something is wrong with my approach to the problem because this is not the answer, however I can't think of any other way to solve it. The answer is 17.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
VincentweZu said:

Homework Statement



If the acceleration of a particle on a horizontal line is x where x represents the position in centimetres from the starting position of zero and if the initial velocity is 8 centimetres per second find the velocity of the particle when it is in a position of 15 centimetres

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted solving the equation using separation of variables.

let x = 15

a = 15
∫dv = ∫15dt
v = 15t + c c = 8
v = 15t + 8
∫dx = ∫15t + 8dt
x = 7.5t2 + 8t Assuming object starts at origin c = 0
15 = 7.5t2 + 8t Solving the quadratic
t = 0.9781

let t = 0.9781
v = 15(0.9781) + 8
v = 22.67cm/s

I know that something is wrong with my approach to the problem because this is not the answer, however I can't think of any other way to solve it. The answer is 17.
So, this is saying that the acceleration, a, is numerically equal to x, the position of the particle?

Of course, this does make an assumption about the units involved. You have position in units of cm. The more important unit is the unit of time, which is usually expressed in units of seconds.​

Yes it's true that when the particle is at position, 15 cm, the its acceleration is, 15 cm/s2. However, you can't treat acceleration as if it's constant, which is what you did.

You need to solve the differential equation \displaystyle\frac{d^2x}{d\,t^2}=x\, , with the initial condition that the the velocity of the particle, dx/dt, is 8 cm/s, when t = 0 s.
 
Last edited:
Assume that the velocity, v, is expressed as a function of position, x. This is natural, since we know acceleration as a function of position.

Using the chain rule with \displaystyle a=\frac{dv}{dt}\,, gives \displaystyle a=\frac{dv}{dx}\,\frac{dx}{dt}\,.

Now replace dx/dt with v .

Can you solve the resulting differential equation?
 
Thanks for your response!

So what I have to do is to start with

a = \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}
a = \frac{dv}{dx}v

Since a = x

x = \frac{dv}{dx}v
∫(x)dx = ∫(v)dv
x2/2 = v2/2 + c where c = 8

Am I on the right track?
 
(CGS unit system)
it is given
a=v dv/dx=x
so
v dv=x dx
integrating both sides

∫v dv=∫x dx where limit of vdv goes from '8 to v' and of xdx goes mrom '0 to x'

so
(v*2)/2 - (8*2)/2=(x*2)/2
on simplification it yields

(v*2) - 64 = (x*2)

now given x=15

v=√289=17cm/s




[I AM 99.99% SURE OF WHAT I've DONE]
[IT WAS DEFINATE INTEGRATION SO NO CONSTANT OF INTEGRATION]
 
Last edited:
VincentweZu said:
Thanks for your response!

So what I have to do is to start with

a = \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}
a = \frac{dv}{dx}v

Since a = x

x = \frac{dv}{dx}v
∫(x)dx = ∫(v)dv
x2/2 = v2/2 + c where c = 8

Am I on the right track?
You were until you said "c= 8"! Initially, v= 8 and x= 0. Putting those into your equation, 02/2= 82/2+ c so 32+ c= 0. c= -32, not 8.

Now set x= 15 and solve for v.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top