What Is the Acceleration of a Thrown Ball at Its Peak?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the acceleration of a thrown ball at various points in its trajectory, emphasizing that the acceleration due to gravity (g) is always directed downwards. During the ascent, the ball experiences negative acceleration (-g) as it decelerates, while at its peak, the acceleration remains -g, not zero, due to the continuous pull of gravity. For the descent, the acceleration is again -g as the ball accelerates downward. In a related problem involving two model cars, calculations show the distance at which they meet after accounting for their respective velocities and accelerations. Ultimately, the conclusion reinforces that gravitational acceleration remains constant at -g throughout the ball's motion.
trollcast
Gold Member
Messages
282
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Problem A:

A ball is thrown upwards and returns to the throwers hand.
Air resistance is ignored and the upwards direction is taken as positive.
Circle the correct values for the acceleration of the ball:

Going up : g / 0 / -g
At max height: g / 0 / -g
Going down: g / 0 / -g


Problem B:

2 model cars are at opposite ends of a 2000mm track.
When timing starts A is moving with a uniform velocity of 50mms-1 towards B.
B starts from rest when timing starts, then accelerates uniformly at 4mms-2 for 10s and then continues towards A with the uniform velocity it has reached.

Calculate the distance from the initial position of A the two cars meet.

Homework Equations



Equations of Motion

The Attempt at a Solution



Problem A:

On the way up the ball is moving in the opposite direction to the force of gravity so g will be -ve as the ball is deccelerating

Then on the way down the opposite is true so g will be +ve.

However at the max height I know the acceleration cannot be 0 as the ball is still being pulled by the force of gravity however I can't decide whether it would be +ve or -ve g.

I think it must be -ve as at the max height it then immediately starts moving downwards so it must have just experienced an acceleration to make it move downwards?

Or should that all be reversed because of the upwards is positive clause?

Problem B:

I calculated the distance traveled by both A and B during the first 10 seconds and got:

A travels 500mm
B travels 200mm

Then there is 1300mm of track left.

A is traveling at 50mms-1 as it is traveling at constant uniform velocity.
I then calculated that B is traveling at 40mms-1 in the opposite direction.

Then I looked at it from the point of view of A.

So A is traveling effectively at 90mms-1 over 1300mm to meet with B.

This then allows me to calculate that that time taken to cover this distance would be 24.444... seconds.

Then I add on the 10 seconds I used earlier.

And use s = 0.5 * (u + v) * t with the values for A to find a distance of 1222.222... mm away from A's starting point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for problem A:

Ask your self if g represents gravitational acceleration has it changed at all after throwing the ball and then catching it?
 
jedishrfu said:
for problem A:

Ask your self if g represents gravitational acceleration has it changed at all after throwing the ball and then catching it?

So then the acceleration would be -g in all cases as the acceleration vector would be downwards in all cases and its been specified that upwards is positive?
 
trollcast said:
So then the acceleration would be -g in all cases as the acceleration vector would be downwards in all cases and its been specified that upwards is positive?
that would be a yes
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top