MHB Linear Transformation of a Plane

bwpbruce
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
$\textbf{Problem}$
Let $\textbf{u}$ and $\textbf{v}$ be linearly independent vectors in $\mathbb{R}^3$, and let $P$ be the plane through $\textbf{u}, \textbf{v}$ and $\textbf{0}.$ The parametric equation of $P$ is $\textbf{x} = s\textbf{u} + \textbf{v}$ (with $s$, $t$ in $\mathbb{R}$). Show that a linear transformation $T: \mathbb{R}^3 \mapsto \mathbb{R}^3$ maps $P$ onto a plane through $\textbf{0}$ or onto a line through $\textbf{0}$ or onto just the origin $\mathbb{R}^3$. What must be true about $T\textbf{u}$

$\textbf{Solution}$

\begin{align*}T(\textbf{x}) &= T(s\textbf{u} + t\textbf{v}) \\&=T(s\textbf{u}) + T(t\textbf{u}) = sT\textbf{(u)} + tT\textbf{(v)}\end{align*}

\begin{align*}T(\textbf{0}) &= sT(\textbf{0}) + tT(\textbf{0})\\&=\textbf{0}\end{align*}

$T(\textbf{x})$ goes through the origin.

$T(\textbf{x})$ is a plane in $\mathbb{R}^3$ through $\textbf{0}$ in the case when $T(\textbf{(u)}) \ne tT(\textbf{(v)})$ and $T(\textbf{(v)} \ne sT\textbf{(u)}$.

$T(\textbf{x})$ is a line in $\mathbb{R}^3$ through $\textbf{0}$ in the case when $T(\textbf{(u)}) = tT(\textbf{(v)})$ or $T(\textbf{(v)} = sT\textbf{(u)}$

$T(\textbf{x})$ is a zero vector $\mathbb{R}^3$ in the case when $T(\textbf{u}) = T\textbf{v} = \textbf{0}$.

Can someone please provide feedback on this solution? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bwpbruce said:
Show that a linear transformation $T: \mathbb{R}^3 \mapsto \mathbb{R}^3$ maps $P$ onto a plane through $\textbf{0}$ or onto a line through $\textbf{0}$ or onto just the origin $\mathbb{R}^3$. What must be true about $T\textbf{u}$
It may be a question of terminology, but I think that the phrase "A function $f$ maps a set $A$ onto a set $B$" means that $f$ is onto, i.e., a surjection. Thus, it is important to understand that you need to prove not only that that the image of every point from the original plane lies on the plain (or line, or point) generated by $0$, $T(\mathbf{u})$ and $T(\mathbf{v})$, but also that every point on the second plain is the image. I don't think you need to change your solution, but this should be kept in mind.

bwpbruce said:
$T(\textbf{x})$ is a plane in $\mathbb{R}^3$ through $\textbf{0}$ in the case when $T(\textbf{(u)}) \ne tT(\textbf{(v)})$ and $T(\textbf{(v)} \ne sT\textbf{(u)}$.
This can be stated by saying that $T(\mathbf{u})$ and $T(\mathbf{v})$ are linearly independent.

bwpbruce said:
$T(\textbf{x})$ is a line in $\mathbb{R}^3$ through $\textbf{0}$ in the case when $T(\textbf{(u)}) = tT(\textbf{(v)})$ or $T(\textbf{(v)} = sT\textbf{(u)}$
This does not prevent the case when both $T(\mathbf{u})$ and $T(\mathbf{v})$ are zero vectors.

Is there any significance in double parentheses?
 
Is there any significance in double parentheses?

No, not really. I appreciate all your contributions.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K