Linearized Gravity and the Transverse-Traceless Gauge Conditions

Alexrey
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working on some things to do with linearized gravitational radiation and I'm trying to justify the claim that in the Lorenz gauge, where \partial_{\nu}\bar{h}^{\mu\nu}=0 (1.1), we are able to impose the additional conditions A_{\alpha}^{\alpha}=0 (1.2) and A_{\alpha\beta}u^{\beta}=0 (1.3) in order to find the two physical polarization states of a gravitational wave. All of the books that I have looked at so far have just stated that we are able to impose (1.1) and (1.2) without any workings of how they achieved this claim.


Homework Equations


Equations (1.1), (1.2), (1.3) as well as the vacuum Einstein field equation \square\overline{h}_{\mu\nu}=0 (where the bar denotes the use of the trace reverse metric perturbation) which leads to the vacuum wave equation \overline{h}_{\mu\nu}=\Re(A_{\mu\nu}e^{ik_{\sigma}x^{\sigma}}). In addition to this, it might be helpful to know that the wave amplitude A_{\mu\nu} is orthogonal to the wave vector k_{\nu}, that is, k_{\nu}A^{\mu\nu}=0. which removes 4 degrees of freedom from the metric perturbation.

The Attempt at a Solution


As it stands I am quite confused and do not know really know where to start with proving that equations (1.1) and (1.2) are possible. In Schutz book "A First Course in General Relativity" after some calculations (on page 205 if you have the book) he does show that under an infinitesimal coordinate transformation we get A_{\alpha\beta}^{'}=A_{\alpha\beta}-ik_{\beta}B_{\alpha}-ik_{\alpha}B_{\beta}+i\eta_{\alpha\beta}k_{\mu}B^{\mu}. where we can choose the B_{\alpha} to impose (1.1) and (1.2).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
However, I do not really understand how this implies that we can impose conditions (1.1) and (1.2) as it doesn't seem to be explicitly stated. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top