Lines and planes (Scalar equation + pt. of int.)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lornt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Planes
Lornt
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
so I've been doing review and I got stuck on two questions, I was wondering if anyone could help me out.
Any help would be appericiated - whether it's a hint on what my first step should be or what's the final answer to confirm whether I'm right or wrong :)


1. Find the scalar equation of the plane that passes through the point (1, 1, 4) and is perpendicular to the line of intersection of the planes x + 2y + z = 1 and 2x + y + 3z = 3.


2. Determine the distance from the point P(2, 3, -1) to the plane 2x + y - 2z + 9 = 0. (I know I can plug the values into the equation, but that doesn't really help me. Could anyone show me a longer way to do this involving more steps? I don't really understand where the equation comes from).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1. Find the scalar equation of the plane that passes through the point (1, 1, 4) and is perpendicular to the line of intersection of the planes x + 2y + z = 1 and 2x + y + 3z = 3.
Start simple, and build up a solution.

What is the scalar equation equation for a plane?
How do you tell if a plane passes through a point?
What is the scalar equation for a plane passing through that point?
What is the line of intersection of those two planes?
How do you tell if a plane is perpendicular to a line?
What is the scalar equation for a plane perpendicular to that line?
What is the scalar equation for a plane passing through that point and perpendicular to that line?

This is a basic problem solving technique: it's useful in just about anything you do.


2. Determine the distance from the point P(2, 3, -1) to the plane 2x + y - 2z + 9 = 0. (I know I can plug the values into the equation, but that doesn't really help me. Could anyone show me a longer way to do this involving more steps? I don't really understand where the equation comes from).
Starting with definitions is another basic problem solving technique.

What is the definition of the distance from a point to a plane?
 
Lornt said:
so I've been doing review and I got stuck on two questions, I was wondering if anyone could help me out.
Any help would be appericiated - whether it's a hint on what my first step should be or what's the final answer to confirm whether I'm right or wrong :)


1. Find the scalar equation of the plane that passes through the point (1, 1, 4) and is perpendicular to the line of intersection of the planes x + 2y + z = 1 and 2x + y + 3z = 3.


2. Determine the distance from the point P(2, 3, -1) to the plane 2x + y - 2z + 9 = 0. (I know I can plug the values into the equation, but that doesn't really help me. Could anyone show me a longer way to do this involving more steps? I don't really understand where the equation comes from).

We could better "confirm whether I'm right or wrong" if you would show us what you have done.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top