Link between Universe mass density and Cosmic Microwave Background energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between the universe's critical density and the energy of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). It calculates the critical density using the Hubble constant and derives the mass of a quantum particle that corresponds to this density, resulting in a mass of approximately 1.7E-38 kg, equivalent to 1 meV/c^2. The conversation highlights the intriguing coincidence between this particle mass and the energy of CMB photons. Participants express uncertainty about the implications of these findings, particularly regarding the scaling differences between mass and radiation density. The discussion encourages deeper personal interpretation of the mathematical results to enhance understanding.
johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Present critical density of Universe

rho_crit = 3 H^2 / 8 Pi G

H = Hubble Constant = 2.2E-18 sec^-1

rho_crit = 8.6E-27 kg / m^3

What particle mass does this represent?

The length scale associated with a quantum particle of mass m is
the Compton wavelength lambda where

lambda = h / m c

This translates to the following density:

rho_particle = mass / volume

rho_particle = mass / lambda^3

rho_particle = m / (h / m c)^3

rho_particle = m^4 c^3 / h^3

Let us equate the two densities:

rho_particle = rho_crit

m^4 = h^3 * 8.6E-27 / c^3

m = 1.7E-38 kg

m = 1 meV / c^2

The Cosmic Microwave Background has a photon energy of 1 meV.

Surprising coincidence or not?

I suppose this is not surprising if the mass and radiation energy at
the recombination time were similar.

Or maybe it is surprising as mass density is supposed to scale as R^-3 whereas radiation density scales as R^-4.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
What's the coincidence?
What are you asking here?
What is the purpose of this?
 
I'm not sure what I'm getting at!
 
johne: why not try to explain to yourself, that is write down and maybe post, what each of your results means to you...make an interpretation of the math...

When I was in college I always found I learned the most when I tried to explain to myself in my own words what I was trying to learn...
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top