Load resistor in circuit: Find the no-load voltage.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving a circuit with a load resistor. Participants are tasked with finding the no-load voltage, the voltage across a load resistor, power dissipation in a resistor when load terminals are short-circuited, and maximum power dissipation in another resistor. The conversation includes theoretical and practical aspects of circuit analysis, including voltage division and power calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to deal with load resistors in the circuit.
  • Another participant suggests that the load resistor is treated like any other resistor but emphasizes the need to see the circuit diagram.
  • A participant proposes redrawing the circuit for each part of the problem to clarify the changes in the circuit configuration.
  • There is a discussion about the missing equation relating power to voltage and resistance, with one participant suggesting the use of P = V^2/R.
  • One participant calculates the voltage across the 30 kΩ resistor using voltage division but questions the correctness of their answer based on the provided solutions.
  • Another participant clarifies that a short circuit means placing a wire across the load resistance, which alters the circuit dynamics.
  • There is confusion expressed by a participant regarding the implications of short-circuiting a resistor and the potential drop across it.
  • Participants discuss the concept of short circuits and open circuits, with some clarifying that a short circuit bypasses resistors and results in no current through them.
  • Technical issues with circuit diagram tools are mentioned, indicating challenges in visualizing circuit configurations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to calculating power dissipation in the circuit when short-circuited. There are multiple interpretations of how to handle the circuit configurations and the implications of short circuits, leading to ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of short circuits versus open circuits, indicating a need for clarification on these concepts. The discussion also highlights potential confusion regarding the application of voltage and power equations in different circuit scenarios.

Color_of_Cyan
Messages
386
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imageshack.us/a/img62/5467/homeworkprob14.jpg

A. Find the no-load voltage of V0

B. Find Vo when RL is 450 kΩ

C. How much power is dissipated in the 30 kΩ resistor if the load terminals are accidentally short circuited

D. What is the maximum power dissipated in the 50k resistor?

Homework Equations


V = IR

Voltage Division:
(Voltage across series resistor) = [(resistance) / total series resistance)](total input V)

Current Division (for 2 parallel resistors):
(current across parallel resistor) = [(other resistor) / (sum of parallel resistors)](total incoming current)]

The Attempt at a Solution



I forgot how to deal with load-resistors, and not sure how they apply to a circuit like this.

I don't need help with part B because, well, that's straight forward, and you find parallel resistance first between the load and other one by V

because: (1/450 + 1/50)^-1 = 45Ω

then using voltage division when you have only 30k and 45k in series:

V knot = [45Ω / (45 + 30)Ω] (120V) = 72VStill need help for other parts though
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The load resistor is treated exactly the same as any other resistor.
I cannot help with the circuit without seeing it though.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The load resistor is treated exactly the same as any other resistor.
I cannot help with the circuit without seeing it though.

I'm able to see the circuit, Simon. Is ImageShack blocked by your firewall? Here is the URL if it helps:

http://imageshack.us/a/img62/5467/homeworkprob14.jpg

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah - I can see it now.
It didn't show up when I posted.

The questions A-D can be understood by redrawing the circuit diagram each time according to the description. i.e. for A, just erase the load resistor part. for C - how does "accidentally short circuiting the load terminals" change the circuit diagram?

I think there is an equation missing too - relating power to voltage and resistance.
 
Yeah I kept editing my post at first to change it to correct info because I got this mixed up with another problem (although similar). Sorry about that. So anyways...
That would be P = V^2/R added to the equations then.For part C, I set the circuit to be the same as in part A (with just 30k and 50k in series) and then did voltage division for the 30k resistor:

V (30k) = (30k / 30k+50k)(120V) = 45V

then

P = V^2 / R = (45)^2 / 30000 which makes it 0.1125 W but this isn't the same as the given correct answer.

The correct answer would mean that V = 120V when doing P = V^2 / R which is (120)^2 / 30000 = 0.48WAssuming the given correct answer for part C really is correct, then why do you have to use 120V for P = V^2 / R? I got part D though, just P = 75^2/50000 and then P = 0.1125 W. 75 V because that's the potential across the 50k resistor found earlier in part A.
 
For part C, I set the circuit to be the same as in part A (with just 30k and 50k in series) and then did voltage division for the 30k resistor

That's what you get if the load terminals are open circuit.
Which is part A.

The question wants:

C. How much power is dissipated in the 30 kΩ resistor if the load terminals are accidentally short circuited

... a short circuit means you put a wire across the load resistance.
 
Alright, I admit I didn't know the difference (now I'm sad, heh). I was never really told about that (enough) in my physics class. I need to brush up on this then too, so if you have another wire that bypasses a resistor that means you can disregard potential drop across that resistor then, right (because here the wire across the load resistor would then also bypass the 50k ohm resistor too, right)? Assuming it's the path of least resistance, though. Thanks for all your help, by the way.
 
Many people have heard the term "short circuit" but don't realize what is involved.
"short circuit" is a wire, "open circuit" is a gap... usually means "no load".

So, in part C, the circuit only has one resistor... well done.

Aside:
You notice that you can draw a better circuit diagram freehand than with a computer?
Price of progress I guess - LaTeX comes to the rescue there too:
http://www.texample.net/tikz/examples/circuitikz/
... don't think PFLatex supports it though.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Many people have heard the term "short circuit" but don't realize what is involved.
"short circuit" is a wire, "open circuit" is a gap... usually means "no load".

So, in part C, the circuit only has one resistor... well done.

So that would be a yes then (in the sense that you really can disregard potential drop across a resistor anytime if the current can go around the resistor in another path (short circuited))

And there's no current through short-circuited resistors either then?
Simon Bridge said:
Aside:
You notice that you can draw a better circuit diagram freehand than with a computer?
Price of progress I guess - LaTeX comes to the rescue there too:
http://www.texample.net/tikz/examples/circuitikz/
... don't think PFLatex supports it though.
and I get this error when trying to download the circuitikz files:

Not Found

The requested URL /mredaelli/about.html was not found on this server.
Thanks again anyways though.
 
  • #10
And there's no current through short-circuited resistors either then?
Sometime the term "sort circuited" is used incorrectly to refer to a resistor (or other component) that has blown up (or otherwise fatally damaged) as a result of a short circuit - somewhere.

A blown up resistor is likely to be an open circuit.
Either way - no current.

Rats about the circuitiks files ... you are right, link seems to be out of date.
I get mine with gnu/linux and Mac users get it with MacTex by default, I keep forgetting how annoying Windows can be.

There is a ctan page about them.

Checking:
http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~cdelker/wp/2012/08/circuit_macros-vs-circuitikz/
... review with links.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K