How Do You Calculate the Center of Gravity for a Carpenter's Square?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the center of gravity of a carpenter's square, it can be divided into two rectangles, with centroids found at (8 cm, 2 cm) and (5.5 cm, 2 cm). The overall centroid is determined using a weighted average, resulting in a center of gravity located at (7.2 cm, 2 cm) from the intersection of the L's arms. For the second problem involving a vertical post, the principle of moments is applied to find the forces exerted by the base on the post, yielding a force of 46.67 N at the top of the right sidewall. The calculations emphasize the importance of correctly identifying pivot points and distances when solving for forces in static equilibrium.
Nanabit
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A carpenter's square has the shape of an L, as in Figure P12.7 (d1 = 16.0 cm, d2 = 4.00 cm, d3 = 4.00 cm, d4 = 11.0 cm). Locate its center of gravity. (Hint: Take (x,y) = (0,0) at the intersection of d1and d4) (I tried to attach the picture but I couldn't get it to work, so just know the width of the whole thing is 4 cm, the length of the vertical part of the L is 16 cm, and the length of the horizontal part of the L is 11 cm.)

I know this has to do with taking the area of the t-square by separating it into 2 rectangles, but I'm not sure what to do from there.

A vertical post with a square cross section is 11.0 m tall. Its bottom end is encased in a base 1.50 m tall, which is precisely square but slightly loose. A force 5.60 N to the right acts on the top of the post. The base maintains the post in equilibrium.
Find the force which the top of the right sidewall of the base exerts on the post. Find the force which the bottom of the left sidewall of the base exerts on the post.

This one I think I am a centimeter away from and don't know why I'm getting it wrong. I know it's the sum of the torques = zero. So I set the centerpoint for part a at the bottom of the base. Then I had (5.6N)(12.5m)=F(1.5m). I did the same thing for part b but set the centerpoint at the top of the base. Am I missing something?

thanks.
 

Attachments

  • p12-07alt.gif
    p12-07alt.gif
    5.3 KB · Views: 676
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Nanabit
I know this has to do with taking the area of the t-square by separating it into 2 rectangles, but I'm not sure what to do from there.
Once you have two rectangles, find the COG of each. Then treat them as two point masses (located at the COGs) to find the COG of the whole system.

This one I think I am a centimeter away from and don't know why I'm getting it wrong. I know it's the sum of the torques = zero. So I set the centerpoint for part a at the bottom of the base. Then I had (5.6N)(12.5m)=F(1.5m). I did the same thing for part b but set the centerpoint at the top of the base. Am I missing something?
The post fits inside the base, not on top of it. Use 11, not 12.5.
 


To locate the center of gravity of the carpenter's square, we can use the formula for finding the centroid of a composite shape. This involves dividing the shape into smaller, simpler shapes and finding the centroid of each shape, then taking the weighted average of their centroids.

In this case, we can divide the carpenter's square into two rectangles, one with dimensions 16 cm x 4 cm and one with dimensions 11 cm x 4 cm. The centroid of a rectangle is located at its center, so the centroid of the first rectangle is at (8 cm, 2 cm) and the centroid of the second rectangle is at (5.5 cm, 2 cm).

To find the overall centroid of the carpenter's square, we take the weighted average of these two centroids. Since the first rectangle has an area of 64 cm^2 and the second rectangle has an area of 44 cm^2, the overall centroid is located at ((64*8 + 44*5.5)/(64+44), (64*2 + 44*2)/(64+44)) = (7.2 cm, 2 cm). This means that the center of gravity of the carpenter's square is located 7.2 cm from the intersection of d1 and d4, on the horizontal part of the L.

For the second problem, we can use the principle of moments to solve for the forces exerted by the base on the post. The principle of moments states that the sum of the clockwise moments is equal to the sum of the counterclockwise moments. In this case, we can take the bottom of the base as the pivot point and set the clockwise moments equal to the counterclockwise moments.

For part a, we have (5.6 N)(12.5 m) = F(1.5 m), where F is the force exerted by the top of the right sidewall of the base on the post. Solving for F, we get F = 46.67 N. This means that the top of the right sidewall exerts a force of 46.67 N on the post.

For part b, we can use the same principle, but this time taking the top of the base as the pivot point. We have (5.6 N)(12.5 m) = F(13.5 m), where F is the force exerted by the bottom of the
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top