Logarithms questions need checking

  • Thread starter Thread starter JakePearson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion confirms that the logarithmic transformation of ln(x²/y²) is correctly simplified to 2ln(x) - 2ln(y), emphasizing that the final expression should maintain the natural logarithm. It clarifies that the initial use of log(A/B) is unnecessary and suggests an alternative form of 2(ln x - ln y) or 2ln(x/y). In contrast, the second question regarding log(2x + 3y) highlights that it cannot be simplified further, as logarithmic properties do not apply to sums of terms. Overall, the participants agree on the correct handling of logarithmic expressions and the limitations of logarithmic properties.
JakePearson
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
1. ln (x2 / y2)
= log (A / B) = logA-logB
= logx2-logy2
= 2logx - 2logy
(is this correct)

2. can this expression be split into separate log functions and numbers, is this question the answer
log(2x + 3y) = log(2x + 3y)
(is this correct)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have in 1. is correct, so you should be able to split, or expand, ln(x2/y2) correctly.
For 2., where did log(2x + 3y) = log(2x + 3y) come from?
 
JakePearson said:
1. ln (x2 / y2)
= log (A / B) = logA-logB
= logx2-logy2
= 2logx - 2logy
(is this correct)

2. can this expression be split into separate log functions and numbers, is this question the answer
log(2x + 3y) = log(2x + 3y)
(is this correct)

For 1, you're mostly on the right track, but since you started with ln, you should end with ln. Also, you shouldn't have the business with A/B in there. IOW, it should look like this:
ln (x2 / y2)
= ln x2-ln y2
= 2ln x - 2ln y

You're pretty much done at this point, but this could also be written as 2(ln x - ln y), which is equal to 2 ln(x/y).

For 2, there is nothing you can do with it. There is no property of logarithms that works on a sum of terms.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top