1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Logic proof

  1. Feb 21, 2005 #1
    Given that XOR is defined by [itex]((X \wedge \neg Y) \vee (\neg X \wedge Y))[/itex], in order to prove that XOR is commutative is it sufficient to prove that
    [itex]((X \wedge \neg Y) \vee (\neg X \wedge Y)) \supset ((Y \wedge \neg X) \vee (\neg Y \wedge X))[/itex]
    is a tautology?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 21, 2005 #2

    Hurkyl

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Think about what that says:

    If (X xor Y), then (Y xor X).

    Is that the same as X xor Y = Y xor X?

    (no)

    Now, in general you would leave the last step implicit, because it's fairly routine, but I imagine you're interested in full rigor.
     
  4. Feb 21, 2005 #3
    OK, I'd like to retract that ridiculous statement before I get banned. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

    Maybe I'd better get some sleep... :zzz:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Logic proof
  1. Proof by logic (Replies: 8)

  2. Logic in proofs question (Replies: 17)

  3. Proof logic, question (Replies: 5)

Loading...