Longitudinal wave from one thin rod to another

Blueman52
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a thin rod of silver (E = 83 GPa, \rho = 10.5 g/cm3) is joined to a thin rod of gold (E = 78 GPa, \rho = 19.3 g/cm3).
Both rods have the same cross sectional area, and a longitudinal wave passes from the silver into the gold.

What amplitude will the transmitted and reflected waves be if the incident wave has amplitude 1?


Homework Equations


v = \sqrt{\frac{E}{\rho}} (velocity)
Z = \frac{AE}{v} (impedance)

The Attempt at a Solution


Esilver = 83 x 109 Pa.
\rhosilver = 1.05 x 104 Kgm-3.

Egold = 78 x 109 Pa.
\rhogold = 1.93 x 104 Kgm-3.

vsilver.jpg

= 2.812 x 103 ms-1.

vgold.jpg

= 2.010 x 103 ms-1.

zsilver.jpg

= 2.952 x 107

zgold.jpg

= 3.881 x 107

Zsilver : Zgold
= 2.952 x 107 : 3.881 x 107
= 0.761 : 1


This is as far as I got.
I presume I have to multiply the amplitude with Zsilver : Zgold
= 1 x 0.761
= 0.761

but I don't know whether this is the amplitude of the reflected or transferred wave.

I would greatly appreciate any help at all.
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would approach the problem by setting up a coordinate system with x=0 as the boundary. To the left, the wave is Aeik1*x + B-ik1*x at t=0, where A is the initial wave and B is the reflection. To the right, it's Ceik2*x. You can calculate B/A and C/A by applying the appropriate boundary conditions.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top