Looking for a high accuracy 3D graphing program

Tegewaldt
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi PF/math !

I've been searching for a program which will draw 3d parametric curves accurately for large variables, eg. f(10^8).
Ive tried www.math.uri.edu and Ti-Nspire (the latter may or may not have a setting for the accuracy), but both tend to turn what should've been a smooth curve into an angled nightmare.

If anyone knows a decent program or how to fix the thing in Ti-Nspire, please let me know!

Thank you for your time and help

-Tegewaldt
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I use pocketCAS on the iPad and it seems to generate pretty smooth curves.

Can you tell us what surface you're trying to plot?
 
i'ts not a surface, it's a parametric curve. 3 independent functions, one for each dimension.
 

Attachments

  • SymPy-Plot_parametric3D-wire-curve.png
    SymPy-Plot_parametric3D-wire-curve.png
    31.9 KB · Views: 500
SciLab? It's like MatLab... but it's free. I love SciLab...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
331
Views
47K
Replies
41
Views
21K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top