Looking for research which encompasses both plasmas and fission.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the exploration of magnetohydrodynamics in designing liquid metal cooled reactors and mentions the potential of fusion-fission hybrids utilizing 14 MeV neutrons for fast fissions in uranium blankets. It contrasts solid fuel systems, which trap fission products, with metal fuels that operate at lower temperatures but face challenges like thermal conductivity reduction due to fission product accumulation. Metal fuels are currently not approved for commercial light water reactor (LWR) operations due to concerns over fuel reliability and fission product retention. Concepts involving UF6 cores with highly enriched uranium are noted, but their adoption for commercial reactors is unlikely. The conversation emphasizes the need for innovative approaches while addressing safety and operational reliability in nuclear reactor designs.
Fusiontron
Messages
108
Reaction score
2
So far I've only found some leads into the use of magnetohydrodynamics theory in designing liquid metal cooled reactors. Anyone know of any other topics?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There has been thought about fusion-fission hybrid in which the 14 MeV neutrons from (d,t) fusion would be used to cause fast fissions in a uranium blanket. Fission systems normally use solid fuel, with the exception of the molten salt reactor (MSR). Solid fuel form trap the solid fission product and most of the volatiles and gases, except for fast and high temperature reactors which experience columnar grain growth and often develop a central void as gases migrate up the thermal gradient.

Metal fuels operate at lower temperature than ceramic fuel, although thermal conductivity can decrease with increasing fissions as fission products accumulate in the metal matrix. Metal fuel can be annular to allow fission gases and volatiles to migrate into the central void, but then one needs a sufficient plenum.

Metal fuels are not approved for commercial LWR operation, and are not likely to be any time soon. A critical issue for commercial plants is fuel reliability, i.e., ideally no failures, and retention of fission products under normal and anomalous operating conditions. Ideally, one avoids postulated accidents.

There have been concepts involving UF6 cores with highly enriched uranium, but such a concept would not be adopted for a commercial power reactor. The core would conceivably be a plasma, but it would probably have to be a coupled core with a solid (dense) component.
 
Some good ideas here man. You always come through with the goods!
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top