Loop analysis with complex components

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges in loop analysis involving complex components in circuit calculations. Participants highlight issues with the assumed directions of loop currents versus branch currents, leading to incorrect values, particularly for I3. A suggestion is made to initially ignore branch currents and solve for mesh currents before recalculating branch currents. Rounding errors are noted as a concern, with recommendations to maintain more decimal places in intermediate results. The impact of sign changes on both the angle and magnitude of complex numbers is also emphasized, indicating that adjustments affect the overall calculations.
geft
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
I'm supposed to find the currents flowing through the circuit. While loop analysis is pretty easy, converting a bunch of complex numbers back and forth can get complicated fast. I'm not asking for the exact answer, but please look through the solution to verify if my working is correct. Many thanks.
 

Attachments

  • _DSC5965.jpg
    _DSC5965.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
You might have a bit of a problem with the assumed directions of the loop currents versus the branch currents as defined when you write the loop equations. It shows up as an incorrect sign for your I3 value, yielding an incorrect angle.

I usually find it convenient to ignore the "ammeter" branch currents to begin with and solve for the mesh currents. Then go back and calculate the branch currents from them, taking into account their relative directions.

You also might consider carrying another decimal place or two through your intermediate results, as rounding errors are making their way into your first decimal place.
 
Many thanks for the feedback. Assuming my calculation is correct, is I1 correct? Can't I3 be fixed by a simple sign change (after converting to rectangular form)?
 
geft said:
Many thanks for the feedback. Assuming my calculation is correct, is I1 correct? Can't I3 be fixed by a simple sign change (after converting to rectangular form)?

The sign change will affect both components of the complex number, since the angle has to move from the 1st quadrant to the third quadrant.
 
gneill said:
The sign change will affect both components of the complex number, since the angle has to move from the 1st quadrant to the third quadrant.

Why would it affect the magnitude (real component) if you can just add 180° to the phase?
 
geft said:
Why would it affect the magnitude (real component) if you can just add 180° to the phase?

It affects the signs of the components.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top