Lorentz Factor for relative velocities

Hirdboy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two particles have velocities u, v in some reference frame. The Lorentz factor for their relative velocity w is given by
\gamma(w)=\gamma(u) \gamma(v) (1-\textbf{u.v})
Prove this by using the following method:
In the given frame, the worldline of the first particle is X =(ct,\textbf{u}t) Transform
to the rest frame of the other particle to obtain
t' = \gamma_v t (1-\textbf{u.v}/c^2)
Obtain dt'/dt and use the result that dt/d\tau = \gamma

Homework Equations


ct' = \gamma (ct-v/c)
x' = \gamma (x-vt)
-Define Lorentz Transform as L
dt/d\tau = \gamma


The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly we are in the frame where the two particles velocities are u and v.
The first step comes from applying LX to give: t' = \gamma_v t (1-\textbf{u.v}/c^2)

Differentiating the result gives dt'/dt = \gamma_v (1-\textbf{u.v}/c^2)
I think that then may be equal to \gamma_u but cannot see how that will help me solve it. Very grateful to all suggestions thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hirdboy said:
dt'/dt = \gamma_v (1-\textbf{u.v}/c^2)

This looks good. You'll now need to "use the result that dt/d\tau = \gamma".

Can you see a way to conjure the proper time ##d\tau## into ##dt'/dt##? Hint: chain rule.
 
Last edited:
Thank you,
This means (I think):

That I'd be right in saying

\frac{dt'}{d\tau} = \gamma_w
and \frac{dt}{d\tau} = \gamma_u

We know \frac{dt'}{dt} = \gamma_v (1-\textbf{u.v}/c^2)
and dt'/d\tau = \frac{dt'}{dt} \frac{dt}{d\tau}

Subbing in gives the desired result \gamma_w=\gamma_u \gamma_v (1-\textbf{u.v}/c^2)

Finding it quite confusing working out what \gamma relates to which velocity, so thank you so much for all your help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top