Lorentz transformation conclusion with rotation of axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the Lorentz transformations as presented in Landau's "The Classical Theory of Fields." A key point is the transformation of the hyperbolic tangent function, tanh(ψ) = V/c, into its components, sinh(ψ) and cosh(ψ), with the introduction of the gamma factor, γ = 1/sqrt(1-V^2/c^2). Participants seek clarification on the mathematical justification for this transformation and whether constants can be arbitrarily added. The conversation emphasizes the geometric interpretation of these transformations using Minkowski space and the Pythagorean theorem. Understanding this method is crucial for grasping the underlying physics of relativity.
TheDestroyer
Messages
401
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys,

I've attached 2 pages from the book of landau "The Classical Theory of fields", I have a question about the lorentz transformations in pages 10,11

after reaching the step:

tanh(psy)= V/c

How did he split the latter into sinh(psy) and cosh(psy) and added the "gamma" constant which is 1/sqrt(1-V^2/c^2) ?

Can we add any constant we want? of course there is a reason

anyone can explain?

I know the Einsteins way of concluding these transformations but I want to understand the rotation of axes method

thanks in advance, please reply as soon as possible :)
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    56.8 KB · Views: 471
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about a [Minkowski-] right-triangle... and its associated Pythagorean theorem [the square-interval]:

write:
\cosh^2 \psi - \sinh^2\psi = 1
as:
\cosh^2 \psi(1 - \tanh^2\psi) = 1
 
Last edited:
Thanks
:approve:
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top