Lorentz Transformation/converting between reference frames

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average speed of a particle with a known lifetime and track length using Lorentz transformations. The particle's lifetime is provided in its moving reference frame, while the track length is given in the detector's reference frame. Participants express confusion about converting values between frames and applying the Lorentz transformation equations correctly. Key concepts such as time dilation and length contraction are highlighted as essential for solving the problem. Understanding these concepts simplifies the calculations needed to determine the particle's speed in terms of the speed of light.
bmb2009
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Particle track detectors are used to measure the speed of particles if the lifetime of the particle is known. Particle X has a lifetime of 256.2 ps. These particles are created in an experiment inside the detector by a given reaction. The particles leave 21.8 cm long tracks on average before they decay into other particles not observable by the detector.
What is the average speed of the particles in terms of the speed of light?


Homework Equations


Lorentz Transformation equations..


The Attempt at a Solution



The particle's life time is given in the moving reference frame and the track distance is given in the reference frame...so I need to convert either value to the other frame and then the velocity is just the distance traveled divided by the lifetime but how do I transform from either reference frame with the given information? It seems like there is not enough information. Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried it though?

Remember that you can use a variable for the velocity.
 
I tried to get as far as I could and I did use a variable for the velocity, the part that I didn't understand how to manage was the transformations.. i.e if L=lorentz factor:
x=L(x'+vt') ..here I kept v as a variable but how would I solve for x when only give t' and not x' as well?
 
Ah, you've been trying to do it the hard way. Do you know the formulas for time dilation and length contraction?
 
actually just went over those today in class which made the problem way easier than i originally thought. Thanks for the guidance!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top