Lorentz Transformations For Particle In Uniform Electromagnetic Field

yusohard
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charge q is released from rest at the origin, in the presence of a uniform electric
field and a uniform magnetic field \underline{E} = E_0 \hat{z} and \underline{B} = B_0 \hat{x} in frame S.
In another frame S', moving with velocity along the y-axis with respect to S, the electric field is zero.
What must be the velocity v and the magnetic field in the frame S' ?

Show that the particle moves in S' in a circle of radius R=m\gamma^2 v / (q B_0) What are the equations in x', y', z, t' which describe the trajectory of the particle in the moving frame S' ?

By transforming from frame S’ show that the path of the particle in the original frame S is:
\gamma^2 (y-vt)^2 + (z-R)^2 = R^2

Homework Equations



Transformations of electric and magnetic fields for boosts in y-direction:

E'_x = \gamma (E_x + \beta c B_z)
E'_y = E_y
E'_z = \gamma (E_z - \beta c B_x)
B'_x = \gamma (B_x - (\beta / c) E_z )
B'_y = B_y
B'_z = \gamma (B_z + (\beta / c) E_x )

Lorentz Force:

\underline{F} = m \gamma \frac{d v}{d x} = m \gamma \frac{v^2}{R} = q \underline{B} \times \underline{v}

The Attempt at a Solution



Only the E field in the z-axis exists and, as stated in the problem, is zero:

E'_z = \gamma (E_0 - \beta c B_0) = 0 \rightarrow v=E_0/B_0

And similarly only the B field in the x-axis has a solution, and using the equation for v above:

B'_x = \gamma (B_0 - (\beta / c) E_0 ) = \gamma B_0 (1 - E^2_0/c^2 B^2_0 ) = B_0 / \gamma

Using the Lorentz force equation above:

m \gamma \frac{v^2}{R} = q B_0/\gamma \rightarrow R=m\gamma^2 v / (q B_0)

Now i doubt how to write equations in x', y', z, t' which describe the trajectory of the particle in the moving frame S'.

I think it should be:

(y'^2 + z'^2) = R^2

As it is in the yz-plane(right?)

If i transform back with y' = \gamma (y - vt) and z'=z I just get:

\gamma^2 (y - vt)^2 + z^2 = R^2

Missing the (z-R)^2 term.

Can anyone see where I've gone wrong or what I've missing?

Any help appreciated. Been driving me crazy.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solved it.

For those interested:

It is indeed going in a circle in the zy-plane in S'. Since it starts at the origin in S' and goes clockwise, the equations of motion in terms of x', y', z' ,t' are:

x'=0
y'=-R Sin(\omega t')
z'=R(1-Cos(\omega t'))
Where \omega = v/R

Transform via usual lorentz transforms for boosts in y-axis:

t'=\gamma (t - \frac{v}{c^2} y)
y=\gamma (y' + v t')

Subbing in for the primed parameters in and following through etc,etc,etc,etc,etc,etc:

y= vt - \frac{R}{\gamma} Sin(\omega \gamma (t - \frac{v}{c^2}y))
z= R(1- \gamma R Cos(\omega \gamma (t - \frac{v}{c^2}y))

Using your favourite trig formula (no prizes for that one), we can see indeed:

\gamma^2(y-vt)^2 + (z-R)^2 = R^2

As required. I'll sleep easy tonight eh.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top