- #1
jcyoon
- 7
- 0
Recently I have posted a preprint on the web (http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0502142)that contradicts the conclusion of the unification of electroweak interactions,
which is the very reason the Standard Model is awarded Nobel prize.
Before putting this preprint, I have asked as many leading researchers as
possible to find out any logical failure of my argument. And I have been
trying to publish it to a journal, but I am having trouble in communication
because of my low profile and the magnitude of its claim. However, I have
not faced anyone who could refute this preprint as most of their
arguments are inconsistent with the fundamentallity of the Dirac equations.
I am deeply ashamed of myself to ask this issue in public, but if I am mistaken,
it would be better to put an end to this now than never. Please be open-minded
to my challenging question and kindly reply me if you or someone you know have
a reasonalbe and rigorous argument against it.
Here is the outline of preprint.
1. Massive particle cannot be represented by pure L,R chirality.
2. Standard Model started with L,R chirality with massless fermion assumption.
Even after the fermion gets its mass term by Higgs mechanism, the fermions are
decribed by L,R chirality as if massless.
3. One may justify this, but those justifications are not free of massless
limit approximation
that violates Lorentz invariance or denial of unification.
4. Therefore, the unification of electroweak is only approximate, which is
inconsistent with Lorentz invariance. That means it looks like an unification,
but it is not true.
Thanks,
J.C. Yoon
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator: