Lorentz violations at high energy (the state of testing)

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0505267
Lorentz violation at high energy: concepts, phenomena and astrophysical constraints
Ted Jacobson, Stefano Liberati, David Mattingly
56 pages, 3 figures, Invited article for Annals of Physics

"We consider here the possibility of quantum gravity induced violation of Lorentz symmetry (LV). Even if suppressed by the inverse Planck mass such LV can be tested by current experiments and astrophysical observations. We review the effective field theory approach to describing LV, the issue of naturalness, and many phenomena characteristic of LV. We discuss some of the current observational bounds on LV, focusing mostly on those from high energy astrophysics in the QED sector at order E/M_Planck. In this context we present a number of new results which include the explicit computation of rates of the most relevant LV processes, the derivation of a new photon decay constraint, and modification of previous constraints taking proper account of the helicity dependence of the LV parameters implied by effective field theory."

Ted Jacobson et al are the recognized world-class experts on testing for tiny deviations from c at the high end----which may become detectable over cosmological distances.
This is an invited article describing the current status of efforts to test for Lorentz violation. If DSR gets shot down, the chances are Jacobson Liberati Mattingly will be on hand, likewise if it is confirmed.
IMO this will not become interesting until around 2007, but this survey article can serve to keep us aware of what to expect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Thank you for providing this article on the current state of testing for Lorentz violation at high energy. It is clear that this is a topic of great interest and importance in the field of physics. The fact that it has been invited for publication in a prestigious journal like Annals of Physics speaks to its significance.

The authors have done a thorough job in reviewing the effective field theory approach to describing LV, the issue of naturalness, and various phenomena that may be indicative of LV. It is also interesting to note that even though LV may be suppressed by the inverse Planck mass, it can still be tested by current experiments and astrophysical observations.

The authors' discussion of the current observational bounds on LV, particularly in the QED sector, is enlightening. The fact that they have presented new results and derived a new photon decay constraint shows that this is an active and evolving area of research.

Overall, this article provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of testing for Lorentz violation at high energy. It is clear that this is a topic that will continue to be of great interest and importance in the coming years. Thank you for bringing this to our attention and keeping us aware of what to expect in the future.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Back
Top