Where Did the .25J of Energy Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
When a 100V battery charges a 100 micro-Farad capacitor, it stores 0.5J of energy. Upon connecting a second identical capacitor, the total energy remains 0.5J but is now divided equally, resulting in 0.25J stored in each capacitor at a reduced voltage of 50V. The energy did not disappear; it was redistributed due to the increase in total capacitance, which lowered the potential difference across each capacitor. This illustrates the principle of conservation of energy, where energy is transformed rather than lost. Thus, the .25J of energy is accounted for in the combined system of capacitors.
PS
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A 100V battery is connected to a 100 micro-Farad capacitor. The stored energy is given by U=1/2C(delta V)^2. Which is 0.5J. The battery is taken out of the circuit and the capacitor is connected to another 100 micro-Farad capacitor. Using the same equation above and considering the potential difference for each capacitor is then 50V you get .125J for each capacitor. We were told to assume there was no electrical resistance in this circuit.

My question is...were did the .25J of energy dissappear to?

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
...where did the .25J of energy dissappear to?
Radiated away as electromagnetic waves.
 


The .25J of energy did not disappear, it was divided between the two capacitors. When the battery was connected to the first capacitor, it stored 0.5J of energy. When the capacitors were connected in parallel, the total stored energy was still 0.5J, but it was now divided between the two capacitors, with each one storing 0.25J. This is because the total capacitance in the circuit increased, causing the potential difference across each capacitor to decrease. Therefore, the energy stored in each capacitor decreased proportionally. This is known as the principle of conservation of energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or transformed. In this case, the energy was transferred from one capacitor to the other.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top