Lost Kinetic Energy in Inelastic Collision of Putty and Pivoting Rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingsmaug
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an inelastic collision between a piece of putty and a pivoting rod, where the putty sticks to the rod. The initial kinetic energy of the putty is calculated to be 2.34 J, while the final kinetic energy after the collision is found to be 1.24 J. The fraction of kinetic energy lost is determined to be approximately 0.47, correcting an earlier miscalculation due to using the wrong velocity. Participants emphasize the importance of accurately identifying where the putty sticks to the rod and using the correct mass values in the equations. The final conclusion highlights the significance of careful calculations in physics problems involving collisions.
kingsmaug
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A piece of putty of mass m = 0.75 kg and velocity v = 2.5 m/s moves on a horizontal frictionless surface. It collides with and sticks to a rod of mass M = 2 kg and length L = 0.9 m which pivots about a fixed vertical axis at the opposite end of the rod as shown. What fraction of the initial kinetic energy of the putty is lost in this collision?

Homework Equations


KE = 1/2mv^2
KE = 1/2Iw^2
L=mvr
L=Iw
I=mL^2/3
I=mr^2

r=L (I'm using the pivot as the point of origin)

The Attempt at a Solution


Based on the wording, it's an inelastic collision, and the putty sticks to the rod.

So, momentum is conserved:

mvL = (mL^2/3+mL^2)w

Using numbers, I found that w = 1.176 rad/s

The initial KE is 1/2mv^2= 2.34

The final KE is 1/2Iw^2= 0.79

KElost/KEi=(KEi-KEf)/KEi = 0.66

but the answer is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did the problem statement give any information regarding where the putty sticks to the rod? I see you assumed that it stuck to the end of the rod. If you guessed "wrong", that could be your source of error. Under this assumption I am also calculating a different value for the angular velocity post-collision.
 
Last edited:
kingsmaug said:
I found that w = 1.176 rad/s
If the mass is striking the end of the rod, that's too low. Are you confusing yourself by using 'm' for both masses in the equation?
 
I don't believe I'm using the wrong ones.

So working it over using the proper masses:

Homework Equations


KE = 1/2mv^2
KE = 1/2Iw^2
L=mvr
L=Iw
I=ML^2/3
I=mr^2

r=L (I'm using the pivot as the point of origin)

mvL=(ML^2/3+mL^2)w

w=mvL/(ML^2/3+mL^2) = 1.47059 rad/sec (I don't understand why it isn't the same, but whatever...)

KEi = 1/2mv^2 = 2.34375 J

KEf = 1/2(ML^2/3+mL^2)w^2 = 1.24081 J

(KEi-KEf)/KEi = 0.470588 Which is correct.

And looking through my calculator's log, I found exactly where I went wrong the first time. I accidentally used 2 as the velocity instead of 2.5. :| The stupid feelings.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top