What Are Good Low Work Function Materials for Photoelectric Effect Experiments?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding low work function materials suitable for photoelectric effect experiments, particularly when light energy is limited to around 4 eV due to window material constraints. Magnesium is suggested as a potential candidate with a work function of approximately 3.7 eV, which is lower than the photon energy available. Concerns are raised about magnesium's oxide layer affecting its work function, as even a thin layer of adsorbates can significantly alter it. Cleaning methods, such as e-beam polishing, are recommended to mitigate these issues. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting stable materials while ensuring effective electron emission.
Lambduh
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys,

I wanted to do an experiment testing the photoelectric effect but am having trouble getting light with energy higher than ~4 eV(300nm) through my window into vacuum as it's made of BK7 instead of something like fused silica. Does anyone know of a good material to use with a work function lower than that so i can see some electrons?:)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry i wasn't very clear. I have a Monochromater source with xenon/deuterium lamps. I want to shine light into a vacuum cell with a sample in it and then collect them at a positively biased cathode then read the current with a picoammeter. However the window on my vacuum cell doesn't transmit light below ~350nm so I'm trying to find a material that i can hit with ~3.5 eV photons and eject some electrons.

I can't seem to find a relatively stable compound with a low enough work function to use. I guess that makes sense because all of the stable compounds want to hold on to those electrons:) So any suggestions would be awesome.

Thanks again!:)

Mark
 
Magnesium has a work function of around 3.7 eV. That is lower than your photon energy.

Zz.
 
Hmm i'll definitely try it thanks! I'm curious though... because magnesium forms an oxide layer(which seems to be hard to remove) won't that affect the work function? Depending on the material I've read that even a monolayer of adsorbates can change the work function by up to ~1eV.

Thanks again:)
 
Lambduh said:
Hmm i'll definitely try it thanks! I'm curious though... because magnesium forms an oxide layer(which seems to be hard to remove) won't that affect the work function? Depending on the material I've read that even a monolayer of adsorbates can change the work function by up to ~1eV.

Thanks again:)

Then you will have to do some form of cleaning, such as e-beam polishing, in situ in vaccum.

Zz.
 
Cool. Thanks for the info Zz.
 
Back
Top