Lower mass limit for neutron stars?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the lower mass limit for neutron stars, questioning if a stable neutron star could exist below the Chandrasekhar limit. The Chandrasekhar limit, primarily associated with white dwarfs, is emphasized as a key factor in determining stability, suggesting that any mass below this threshold would not form a neutron star but instead convert to a white dwarf. Research indicates that the minimum mass for a neutron star is approximately between 0.88 and 1.28 solar masses, largely unaffected by the presence of hyperons. Most neutron stars observed fall below this limit, with the lowest known mass around one solar mass. The conversation concludes that the core mass of the progenitor star significantly influences the formation and stability of neutron stars.
Reedbeta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was wondering, does anyone know of a lower limit on the mass of a neutron star from fundamental physics? That is, the smallest it could be before its pressure would make it explode.

I don't mean the Chandrasekhar limit, as that's the upper limit for a white dwarf. Neutron stars occurring "in the wild" probably can't be too much smaller than this, as they would never have collapsed to a neutron star in the first place, but ignoring that fact, might much-smaller neutron stars be stable if they could somehow be created?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The funny thing about neutron stars is they don't explode. If a neutron star accretes enough mass after formation, it will collapse into a black hole.
 
I think the Chandrasekhar limit is the limit. The Chandrasekhar limit isn't based on stellar evolution or detailed mechanisms of collapse. It's based on stability. If you could initially form a ball of neutrons with a mass under the Chandrasekhar limit, I think it would do n\rightarrow p+e^-+\bar{\nu} and turn into a white dwarf.
 
bcrowell said:
I think the Chandrasekhar limit is the limit. The Chandrasekhar limit isn't based on stellar evolution or detailed mechanisms of collapse. It's based on stability. If you could initially form a ball of neutrons with a mass under the Chandrasekhar limit, I think it would do n\rightarrow p+e^-+\bar{\nu} and turn into a white dwarf.

Intriguing thought! I suspect you are right. Nothing else seems to make sense.
 
See http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0012321
On the minimum and maximum mass of neutron stars and the delayed collapse
Authors: Klaus Strobel, Manfred K. Weigel (University of Munich)
(Submitted on 14 Dec 2000)
Abstract: The minimum and maximum mass of protoneutron stars and neutron stars are investigated. The hot dense matter is described by relativistic (including hyperons) and non-relativistic equations of state. We show that the minimum mass ($\sim$ 0.88 - 1.28 $M_{\sun}$) of a neutron star is determined by the earliest stage of its evolution and is nearly unaffected by the presence of hyperons. The maximum mass of a neutron star is limited by the protoneutron star or hot neutron star stage. Further we find that the delayed collapse of a neutron star into a black hole during deleptonization is not only possible for equations of state with softening components, as for instance, hyperons, meson condensates etc., but also for neutron stars with a pure nucleonic-leptonic equation of state.
Comments: 6 pages, 4 figures, using EDP Siences Latex A&A style, to be published in A&A
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph); Nuclear Theory (nucl-th)
Journal reference: Astron.Astrophys.367:582,2001
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000428
Cite as: arXiv:astro-ph/0012321v1
 
bcrowell said:
I think the Chandrasekhar limit is the limit. The Chandrasekhar limit isn't based on stellar evolution or detailed mechanisms of collapse. It's based on stability. If you could initially form a ball of neutrons with a mass under the Chandrasekhar limit, I think it would do n\rightarrow p+e^-+\bar{\nu} and turn into a white dwarf.

The key factor is the core mass of the progenitor star. The supernova event that births a neutron star expels a large fraction of the progenitor star mass. Most known neutron stars fall below the Chandrasekhar mass limit. The lowest known neutron star mass is around 1 solar.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top