Lower wishbone stress calculation problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on validating a front suspension assembly design through stress calculations for a locost sports car. The user has calculated the reaction force at the wheel end during a 3g bump and is seeking confirmation on the accuracy of their calculations, particularly regarding the force at the suspension bracket and the bending moment (M). It is emphasized that the moment should be calculated using the correct distance from the point of rotation to the force application point. Additionally, the second moment of area must reflect the cross-sectional area of the tubing, and if using two bars, the combined area should be considered. The importance of dynamic analysis for accurate stress evaluation is also highlighted.
brown
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I was wondering if some one could help me with my stress calculation problem.

I have designed a front suspension assembly for a locost sports car on pro/e. I would like to validate my design by performing some bending moment calculations of the part and then comparing the stress found in a 3g bump situation to that of the yield stress.
I have performed some of the calculations so far but don't know if i am going in the right direction and what to do next. I'm working in SI units.

I have simplified the v shaped wishbone to one length of tubing.
length = 0.3429m

One end is connected to the chassis and rotates about the bracket.

The other is connected to the lower ball joint that connects to the wheel and upright assembly.

The suspension spring and damper bracket centre is located 0.08407m from the lower balljoint.

The force at the wheel end is the reaction force of half the axle wieght + 3g
weight of axle = 300kg /2 = 150kg x 3g = 4414.5N
In a 3g bump the wishbone will rotate up wards and the damper would compress right up to the bump stops and so effectively would be stationary. therefore if clockwise moments = anti clockwise then..
4414.5N x 0.3429 = A x 0.2588

( 0.2588 is 0.3429 - 0.08407)

therfore A (force at suspension bracket =
5849.03N

I found the second moment of area to be..
I = 2 x10-8 m2

and y = 0.0127m

so if sigma = My/I then i should be able to find sigma and see if is below the yeild stress of the steel

This is how far i got with the calculations

Is the force at the suspension bracket correct?
What is M ?
I wanted the calculations to be for two bars side by side so to get the corect stress do i change the second moment of area to the value for two bars or,
perform the calcs for one bar and then x 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suspensions are a complicated thing to anylize because of all of the forces you have to account for. Plus, you're doing static calculations. If you really want to look at the
actual stresses, you're going to have to do a dynamic analysis.

For the simplified model, I would look at modeling the tube as a beam with a ball and socket at one end andthe other free with a rigid support at the point of shock absorber attachment. I would also look at the moment you are using. At the point the strut bottoms out, you are not going to be seeing the axle weight, you'll be seeing the inertial load from the mass of the vehicle itself, plus the load created by the strut compression. You're going to have to estimate the force distribution to the wheels and then you will have an idea as to what the moment about the strut attachment point is.

See if you can't get your model to someone with ANSYS.
 


Hi there,

It sounds like you have made some good progress on your stress calculation problem. It is always a good idea to validate your design through calculations before moving on to physical testing.

To answer your questions, the force at the suspension bracket seems to be correct based on the information you have provided. However, it would be helpful to have a clear image or diagram of your assembly to confirm this.

In terms of the "M" in the equation, this represents the bending moment. It is the product of the force and the distance from the point of rotation (in this case, the bracket) to the point where the force is applied (in this case, the wheel end). It is important to make sure you are using the correct distance in your calculation.

As for the second moment of area, it should be calculated based on the cross-sectional area of your tubing. If you are using two bars side by side, you would need to consider the combined cross-sectional area in your calculation. You could also perform the calculations for one bar and then multiply by two, but make sure you are using the correct value for the second moment of area in this case.

I hope this helps and good luck with your calculations!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top