Lucy's Stone: A Physics Challenge

  • Thread starter Thread starter calculator20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Physics
AI Thread Summary
Lucy throws a stone upwards from a cliff at 15 m/s, reaching a maximum height of 11 m before falling back down. The time for the stone to reach the sea is calculated as 5.8 seconds using the quadratic equation. Alternative methods to find the time include calculating 4.3 seconds for the stone to fall 91 m from its peak and adding 1.5 seconds for the ascent. Another approach involves determining that it takes 3 seconds to return to Lucy's hand and 2.8 seconds to fall the remaining 80 m. The discussion clarifies the calculations and addresses the confusion around the time values.
calculator20
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Lucy stands on the edge of a vertical cliff and throws a stone vertically upwards. The stone leaves her hand with speed 15m/s at the instant her hand is 80m above the surface of the sea. Air resistance is negligible and the acceleration of free fall is 10m/s/s.

First part is to calculate the maximum height reached which I've done and is 11m.

Second part is to find the time for the stone to reach the sea. I have found the correct answer of 5.8s eventually using the quadratic equation which is fine but quite tricky. This is where my question comes in.

The mark scheme also mentions as an alternative finding 4.3s as the time to fall 91m added to 1.5 for max height or finding 3 to return to hand and then 2.8 to fall 80 m. This is annoying me as I can't see where these answers come from? I assume the 1.5 comes from v/a = 15/10 and that it is doubled for 3 but how are they getting 4.3 and/or 2.8? I've tried every combination of motion equation and I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the top of the trajectory stone doesn't move, so it has to fall 91 m with acceleration g and no initial speed. That yields 4.3 s.

When the stone goes down, once it reaches the cliff level it has exactly the same speed, but opposite direction - so you have a free fall with v0 = 15 m/s (do you know why?) and 80 meters to go. That yields 2.8 s.

Up and down in 3 s is just a free fall with initial speed going up. Going up takes exactly the same time it takes to go down.
 
Borek said:
When the stone goes down, once it reaches the cliff level it has exactly the same speed...
Not the cliff level,the hand level(80 m)
 
adjacent said:
Not the cliff level,the hand level(80 m)

Good point, lousy wording on my side.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top