Luminosity of the Earth covered in bulbs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stendhal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Luminosity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total power output of 100W light bulbs covering the Earth's surface and comparing it to the Sun's luminosity. The surface area of the Earth is determined to be approximately 4.5 * 10^20 cm^2, leading to a total power output of 1.5 * 10^21 W from the bulbs. This results in a luminosity ratio of the Sun to the Earth-bulb setup of about 7 * 10^4. To match the Sun's luminosity, each bulb would need to be significantly more powerful, specifically 10,000W. The calculations were verified, correcting an initial error in surface area conversion.
Stendhal
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known ddata
a.) Assume that a 100W light bulb covers 30cm^2 of area, and covers the surface of the Earth (land and water) with such 100W bulbs. How would the total power output compare with the luminosity of the Sun? Note: L_sun = 10^26W and the radius of the Earth is 6*10^6 meters.

b.) Which wattage would each light bulb need to be to make the luminosity of the entire Earth equal to the luminosity of the Sun?

Homework Equations


Surface area = 4πr^2

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Studying for finals and found an old test problem that I got wrong.

Initially I calculated the Surface area of the Earth
4*π*(6*10^6 m )^2 = 4.5 * 10^14 m^2 = 4.5 * 10^20 cm^2

I set the surface area of the Earth over the area of the bulb and multiplied that by the wattage of the bulb:

SA/A = (4.5*10^20 cm^2)/(30 cm^2) = 1.5 * 10^19 * 100W = 1.5 * 10^21 W

Then made a ratio of the luminosity of the Sun over the Earth-bulb:

Ls/Le = 10^26/1.5 * 10^21 ≈ 7 * 10^4 difference.

For part b, each bulb would have to be 100 times more luminous, so 100^2 W instead of just 100W.

This isn't what I did on the test, rather what I did just now. I don't quite know if this is correct, so I'm hoping someone could verify if it is or not. Thank you for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are 100 cm in 1 m, so 10^14 m^2 is 10^18 cm^2, not 10^20 cm^2.
 
Ah, yes, thank you. I made a calculator error there. Does everything else seem fine to you?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top