Lunar Rover Equipped with HD Video Camera

AI Thread Summary
There is a notable interest in developing a lunar rover capable of navigating the moon's surface while capturing HD video, with potential funding sources identified through product placement deals. The idea includes marketing opportunities, such as featuring brands like Coca-Cola in lunar imagery, which could generate significant revenue despite concerns about pollution. Additionally, there is a concept of allowing people to virtually drive the rover, creating an engaging experience tied to lunar exploration. The engineering challenges of such a project are acknowledged, but efforts are underway, as evidenced by initiatives like the Google Lunar X Prize. The lack of HD video footage of the lunar surface remains a point of frustration for enthusiasts.
lovenugget
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I want to know why someone hasn't built a 'rover' of some sort that could easily navigate the lunar surface while recording HD video. I don't think funding would be an issue since you could easily strike a deal with a large company pertaining to product placement i.e. a coca-cola bottle in the lunar dust, snap a picture with the Earth in the background and then BAM the money would roll in (forget the fact that it's essentially polluting the surface).

You could also sell time on the rover- people would line up for miles to drive around on the surface within a designated area. you could hold the event at night (on earth), while simultaneously looking up at the moon... for a small fee of course.

I for one find the exploration of the moon interesting and it bothers me that no one has HD video of the lunar surface.

Is it an engineering challenge or what?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To say it's an engineering challenge is an understatement. That being said, people are working on it: http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/

physicists.png
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
66K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top