Lyapunov Theory: Find Unique Equil Pt.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ceomtcl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lyapunov Theory
ceomtcl
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Lyapunov Theory: Please Help!

Homework Statement


If the origin x=0 is globally asymptotically stable equilibrium point of the system then it must be the _________ equilibrium point of the system.


Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



This is an objective/one word answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I have around 50 such objective questions for the assignments. I am done with 40 plus, but a few of these are haunting ms and i am not sure about them! Any help is highly appreciated!
 


Hint: If the point x=0 is a "globally asymptotically stable equilibrium point", what happens as you approach x=0 from any direction, from any starting point? Can there be any other equilibrium points?
 


1. I believe that if the point x=0 is a "globally asymptotically stable equilibrium point" then if we approach x=0 from any direction then it will converge to equilibrium point. Am I right?

2. According to me, there is no other equilibrium point.

Please let me know if i am right?
 


sounds right to me! :smile:
 


So, the blank should be "only". Just wanted to confirm if it is what you want to say.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top