Lyman Alpha Photons in Visible, UV, X-Ray & Gamma Ray Spectra

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaidon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying the presence of Lyman alpha photons for hydrogen-like atoms with atomic number Z greater than one across different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum: visible, UV, X-ray, and gamma-ray. Initial calculations indicate that no Lyman alpha photons exist in the visible range, while for the UV range, Z must be 12 or lower. The calculations for the X-ray range are proving challenging, suggesting a potential need for a simpler approach. The poster expresses frustration over their inability to resolve the issue despite ensuring proper unit conversions. Assistance is sought to clarify the calculations and methodology.
jaidon
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Consider the Lyman photons for Hydrogen-like atoms with Z greater than one. Which of these atoms have Lyman alpha photons in the 1)visible 2)UV 3)X-ray and 4)gamma-ray parts of the spectrum? Can list ranges of values of Z in the answers.

My thoughts are to use


1/lambda= (-Ze^2/2ahc)(1/n^2-1/m^2) where a is the Bohr radius and n=2, m=1.

I started by putting in the ranges i know for the different radiations ie) visible ranges from 4000 angstrom to 7000 angstrom, and solving for Z. I got results using this method that say that there are none in the visible range and for the UV, Z= 12 or under. Things are falling apart with the X-ray range which leads me to believe that there is a simpler method.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks


Note: i did make sure that everything was in the appropriate units.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have tried working on this the last few days, but have been unable to decide what is going on. I know there must be an easy way to do this, but for some reason i am stuck. Any help? Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top