Maclaurin Series for Expanding sin(2x)^2: Step-by-Step Guide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expanding the function f(x) = (sin(2x))^2 into a Maclaurin series. The initial approach of transforming (sin(2x))^2 into a different form was incorrect, as it led to a misunderstanding of the coefficients. The correct identity used is sin^2(x) = 0.5(1 - cos(2x)), which simplifies to sin^2(2x) = 0.5(1 - cos(4x)). When applying the Maclaurin series for -0.5cos(4x), the coefficient 0.5 cancels out with the -0.5 from the series expansion, leading to the correct series representation. The constant term of the series for sin(2(2x)) is confirmed to be zero.
vabamyyr
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
i have trouble expandind f(x)= (sin2x)^2 into Maclaurin series
for sin(x) Maclaurin series is

\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}

probably the key is to change (sin2x)^2 into new shape. I found that

(sin2x)^2=2sin(2x^2), but that coefficent 2 is bothering me, what to do?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
vabamyyr said:
(sin2x)^2=2sin(2x^2), but that coefficent 2 is bothering me, what to do?
That relation does not hold (the left side is always positive, the right side isn't).

But you can use another identity:

\sin^2 x=\frac{1}{2}(1-\cos 2x)
 
\sin^2 2x=\frac{1}{2}(1-\cos 4x)=0.5-0.5cos4x


and now if i apply for cosx maclaurin series expansion considering the function f(x)= -0,5cos4x i get the right answer but I am puzzled, where does the coefficent 0,5 go? i don't have to count that??
 
Last edited:
The constant term of the series for sin2(2x) is 0.
The 0.5 cancels the -0.5 from the expansion of -0.5*cos(4x).
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top