Macro objects and superposition of states

entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
Is a living macro object, such as a cat or human being, in fact in a superposition of states?
(I am thinking about for instance the multiple-universe idea)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
entropy1 said:
Is a living macro object, such as a cat or human being, in fact in a superposition of states?
(I am thinking about for instance the multiple-universe idea)

At any given instant, there are probably a small number of individual systems at the molecular level in your body that are in quantum superpositions, however for the most part, people (or cats) have undergone decoherence, and are thus best described as being in mixed states. To learn about the distinction between superpositions and mixed states, try reading this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_state#Pure_and_mixed_states

The upshot is that superpositions are coherent, i.e. there is a well-defined phase relationship between the components of the state. Decoherence can be thought of as the process of degradation of the coherence. A superposition that undergoes complete decoherence ends up as a mixed state.
 
entropy1 said:
Is a living macro object, such as a cat or human being, in fact in a superposition of states?
(I am thinking about for instance the multiple-universe idea)
Any state is unique.
But some people do like destroy unique state in the superposition of other unique states of unliving abstract objects.
 
SpectraCat said:
At any given instant, there are probably a small number of individual systems at the molecular level in your body that are in quantum superpositions, however for the most part, people (or cats) have undergone decoherence, and are thus best described as being in mixed states. To learn about the distinction between superpositions and mixed states, try reading this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_state#Pure_and_mixed_states

The upshot is that superpositions are coherent, i.e. there is a well-defined phase relationship between the components of the state. Decoherence can be thought of as the process of degradation of the coherence. A superposition that undergoes complete decoherence ends up as a mixed state.

just realized that PF doesn't like links to wikipedia sections, so the link I posted above is broken (although it seemed to work fine when I previewed it) ... so check out the section on "Pure and Mixed States" at this link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_state
 
SpectraCat said:
just realized that PF doesn't like links to wikipedia sections,
Looks fine to me. You just have to click on it rather than try to copy-paste it.
 
Hurkyl said:
Looks fine to me. You just have to click on it rather than try to copy-paste it.

Yeah .. it works for me now too .. however just before I wrote that last post, I had clicked on a link to a wikipedia section in another thread, and I got the PF-version of the Not Found page. I thought "uh oh" and I came back here and tried my link from last night, and got the same message. However when I tried it again just now everything seems fine. Perhaps it is just some weird browser-PF-OS clash (I use FF 5.0 on Mac OS 10.5.8) that is exclusive to my machine.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
143
Views
10K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
140
Views
11K
Back
Top