How Can We Derive the General Stress Tensor Without Assuming Linear Media?

In summary: E} + \mu\left(\textbf{H} + \textbf{M} + \textbf{v} \times (\nabla \times \textbf{H})\right) + \mu(\nabla \cdot \textbf{M})\textbf{v} - (\textbf{M} \cdot \nab
  • #1
Alexandra
5
0

Homework Statement


Hi everyone! My name is Alexandra, and I'm new in this forum. I am trying to determine the mentionated tensor without the assumption of linear media or vacuum ( ## \textbf{D} = \epsilon \textbf{E} ## and ## \textbf{B} = \mu \textbf{H} ##). What I want to obtain is the "general" stress tensor with constitutive equations ## \textbf{D} = \epsilon \textbf{E} + \textbf{P} ## and ## \textbf{B} = \mu ( \textbf{H} + \textbf{M} ) ##

Homework Equations


##\textbf{f} = \rho \textbf{E} + \textbf{j} \times \textbf{B} ## Force per unit volume
## \textbf{D} = \epsilon \textbf{E} + \textbf{P} ##
## \textbf{B} = \mu ( \textbf{H} + \textbf{M} ) ##
Macroscopic Maxwell Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


##\textbf{f} = \rho \textbf{E} + \textbf{j} \times \textbf{B} ##

I reeplace the charge/current densities by the fields E and B, usindg Gauss and Ampere's law:
##\textbf{f} = \nabla . \textbf{D} \textbf{E} + \nabla \times \textbf{H} \times \textbf{B} - \dfrac{\partial \textbf{D}}{\partial t} \times \textbf{B}## (1)

Now, using product rule of derivaties, and Faraday Law(I won't use textbf):

##\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}(D \times B) = \dfrac{\partial D}{\partial t} \times B + D \times \dfrac{\partial B}{\partial t} = \dfrac{\partial D}{\partial t} \times B - D \times \dfrac{\partial E}{\partial t}##

Using this result on (1):

##f = (\nabla . D )E + (\nabla \times H) \times B - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial t} (D \times B) - D \times \dfrac{\partial E}{\partial t}##

I know that isn't much, but if I add a term ##(\nabla . B) B ## it doesn't solve anything, because I can't eliminate the curves, like in the most books/papers that use the mentionated before. If someone can help me I will be grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello Alexandra,

Welcome to the forum! It's great to have you here. I understand your question and I will try my best to help you out.

Firstly, I would like to clarify that the stress tensor, also known as the Maxwell stress tensor, is defined as:

##\sigma_{ij} = \epsilon_{0}E_{i}E_{j} + \mu_{0}H_{i}H_{j} - \frac{1}{2}\delta_{ij}\left(\epsilon_{0}E^{2} + \mu_{0}H^{2}\right)##

This tensor is used to determine the forces and stresses on a material due to the presence of electric and magnetic fields. It is derived from the Lorentz force law, which is given by:

##\textbf{f} = q(\textbf{E} + \textbf{v} \times \textbf{B})##

In your attempt at a solution, you have used the macroscopic Maxwell equations and the Lorentz force law to derive an expression for the force per unit volume. However, this expression does not involve the stress tensor and therefore, it cannot be used to determine the general stress tensor.

To obtain the general stress tensor, we need to start with the Lorentz force law and use the constitutive equations for electric and magnetic fields:

##\textbf{f} = q\left(\epsilon\textbf{E} + \textbf{P} + \textbf{v} \times \mu(\textbf{H} + \textbf{M})\right)##

Now, we can use the product rule of derivatives and Faraday's law to rewrite this equation as:

##\textbf{f} = q\left[\epsilon\textbf{E} + \mu\left(\textbf{H} + \textbf{M} + \textbf{v} \times (\nabla \times \textbf{H})\right) + \textbf{v} \times \left(\nabla \times \textbf{M}\right)\right]##

Using the identity ##\nabla \times (\textbf{a} \times \textbf{b}) = \textbf{a}(\nabla \cdot \textbf{b}) - \textbf{b}(\nab
 

1. What is a macroscopic stress tensor?

A macroscopic stress tensor is a mathematical representation of the stress state of a material at a macroscopic level. It describes the distribution of forces acting on a material and how it responds to those forces.

2. How is a macroscopic stress tensor calculated?

A macroscopic stress tensor is calculated by taking the average of the microscopic stress tensors of all the individual particles in a material. This average gives a representation of the overall stress state of the material.

3. What information does a macroscopic stress tensor provide?

A macroscopic stress tensor provides information about the magnitude and direction of the stresses acting on a material. This can help determine how the material will deform or behave under different loading conditions.

4. What is the difference between a macroscopic stress tensor and a microscopic stress tensor?

A macroscopic stress tensor represents the overall stress state of a material, while a microscopic stress tensor represents the stress state of individual particles within the material. The macroscopic stress tensor is an average of all the microscopic stress tensors.

5. How is a macroscopic stress tensor used in materials science?

A macroscopic stress tensor is used in materials science to understand how materials respond to external forces and how they deform or fail under different loading conditions. It is also used in the design and testing of materials for various applications.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
856
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
970
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
953
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top