Magic Squares & Cubes: Uncovering a 3D Arithmetic Sequence

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qaiser Raza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magic Squares
Qaiser Raza
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello to you all!
I've been involved in Magic Squares & Cubes for the last 8-9 years. I've recently developed 3-D models of that, too. What I've observed is a unique relationship between simple Arithmetic Sequence & Magic Squares & Cubes. Combining the two, I've reached a new 3 Dimensional Arithmetic Sequence. As my 3D theory has got some Intriguing ideology, so it will also have some serious impact upon the Probability Theory in future. There is No attachment with my msg but I can send photogrph of my 3D model to any1 around the world, should they be interested. I'm Not very highly educated but I've got something more than interesting to share whoever sees interest in my work.
Qaiser Raza
Lahore - Pakistan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Qaiser Raza said:
Hello to you all!
I've developed 3-D models of Magic Squares which I can also caculate and prove with the help of a new mathematical formula. I'm not very highly educated but I've got something more than interesting to share with interested individuals worldover. Because I believe this theory of mine will find some serious implication upon Probability Theory in future.
Qaiser Raza
Lahore - Pakistan

So where is that?what is the basic magic thing in that Squares, u said u want to share and there is not even any attachment with ur post !
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top