Magnectic force on current carrying wire

AI Thread Summary
A current-carrying wire experiences a magnetic force despite having a net charge of zero because it consists of moving negative charges (electrons). The force on the wire can be described by the equation dF=I*dl x B, where the current represents the flow of these charges. While the positive charges in the wire remain stationary and do not experience a magnetic force, the moving electrons do feel the force due to their motion in the magnetic field. The discussion emphasizes that the concept of net charge is not relevant to the magnetic force experienced by the current. Understanding this principle does not require delving into Lorentz transformations or relativity.
bharath423
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The net charge in a current-carrying wire is zero.Then,why does a magnetic field exert a force on it?

Homework Equations



dF=I*dl x B

The Attempt at a Solution


if we take a small portion of wire the net charge is zero,so if i take the frame of electrons that is I am moving so i have a charge with me..and i get a force due to it..i don't know weather my explanation was correct or wrong??

dont go to lorentz transformation to explain..(in case needed)..because i don't have the idea of relativity theory in maxwell equations..im saying this because i had read many post on similar kind of topic where every one finally explained with lorentz transformation..saying that in one frame its magnetism..its electricity in another frame..:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the net charge have to do with it? A moving charge will experience a force in a magnetic field via F = qv x B. The current is just a lot of negative charges moving, so the current should feel the same force. The positive charges are stationary, so there is no counter-balancing magnetic force on them.
 
yes..thank u...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top