Magnet configuration for spinning permanent magnet induction heating

In summary, the conversation discusses the generation of eddy currents and Joule heating in a stationary copper tube when permanent magnets are moved relative to it. The focus then shifts to a rotor with 4 permanent magnets rotating inside a stationary tube, and the questions of which magnet configuration (alternating or constant polarity) would heat the stator faster and require more torque to turn the rotor. It is suggested that the alternating magnet configuration would produce more heat due to a greater change in the magnetic field, but both configurations would require the same amount of torque. The speaker suggests experimenting with both configurations to determine the actual results.
  • #1
positron96
4
0
Watch this video:

Permanent magnets moving relative to a stationary copper tube generate Eddy currents which result in Joule heating of the copper. Simple enough.

Let's change the problem to a rotor with 4 (circumferential) permanent magnets rotating inside a stationary (aluminum or copper) tube at some given RPM.

1. Which would heat the stator faster: magnets placed in alternating polarity (NSNS) or the same polarity (NNNN) around the rotor? I think it would be alternating because an area element on the stator would see more variation in the field per revolution.

2. Which would require more torque to turn the rotor: alternating or constant? I think they would be the same because the field strength and relative velocity are the same as the stator element passes each magnet, so the Lorentz force should be the same for both configurations.

3. Why does the alternating magnet configuration generate more heat but require the same amount of torque? Where did I go wrong?

Any links or references would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
If one configuration achieves greater heating, it follows that its rotation will demand greater torque. There is no such thing as a free lunch!

I think you should build both and experiment. :smile:
 
  • #3
Any eddy currents produced in the pipe would produce a counter magnetic field apposing the "changing" magnetic field of the rotating magnets. if the magnets have all the same poles, then the change in the magnetic field is mainly a change in field intensity, but if you have alternating field poles you have a complete cycle of the magnetic field from a maximum positive direction, then through a point with no magnetic influence, then a maximum field strength in the opposite polarity, resulting in a much larger change in the magnetic field over the same time period. Only a change in the magnetic field across the pipe creates eddy currents. You get much the same effect from running a single current carrying conductor through an electrical metallic conduit due to the alternating magnetic field created by the alternating current traveling through the wire. that's why you always run the return conductor through the conduit to cancel out the magnetic fields of the feed conductor, or you run multi phase conductors all together in the same conduit for the same reason. The alternating field poles would create more heat at the same angular velocity as an armature with the same poles, and would require more torque to operate.
 

1. What is the purpose of magnet configuration for spinning permanent magnet induction heating?

The purpose of magnet configuration for spinning permanent magnet induction heating is to create a rotating magnetic field that induces eddy currents in a conductive material, causing it to heat up. This method is commonly used in induction cooktops and industrial heating processes.

2. How does the magnet configuration affect the efficiency of induction heating?

The magnet configuration plays a crucial role in the efficiency of induction heating. A well-designed configuration will ensure a uniform and strong magnetic field, resulting in better heat distribution and faster heating times. Poorly configured magnets can cause uneven heating and energy losses, leading to decreased efficiency.

3. What factors should be considered when designing a magnet configuration for spinning permanent magnet induction heating?

When designing a magnet configuration for spinning permanent magnet induction heating, factors such as the shape and size of the magnets, the distance between them, and the speed of rotation must be carefully considered. The material being heated and the desired heating rate also play a role in determining the optimal magnet configuration.

4. Can the magnet configuration be adjusted for different types of materials?

Yes, the magnet configuration can be adjusted to suit different types of materials. For example, materials with higher electrical resistivity may require a stronger magnetic field, and therefore, a different magnet configuration. Additionally, the speed of rotation may need to be adjusted for different materials to achieve the desired heating rate.

5. Are there any disadvantages to using spinning permanent magnets in induction heating?

One potential disadvantage of using spinning permanent magnets in induction heating is the higher cost compared to other methods. Additionally, the magnets may require maintenance and replacement over time. However, the efficiency and precision of this method often outweigh these potential drawbacks.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
968
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
782
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top